期刊文献+

基于产品创新的企业R&D行为与定价策略研究 被引量:5

Study on R&D Behavior and Pricing Strategy of Firms Based on Product Innovation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当企业进行产品创新时,升级后的产品面临重新定价并带来市场竞争格局的改变.针对这一问题,将双寡头企业非对称R&D行为引入Hotelling模型,同时将传统Hotelling模型中外生的定价策略作为内生变量,研究技术溢出条件下的两阶段R&D/产品问题.研究发现,产品创新是提升企业竞争力的有效途径,歧视定价是企业获得超额利润的占优策略.在均衡定价策略下,创新企业表现出明显的研发"惰性,"R&D投入与技术溢出水平负相关.当政府对企业产品创新实施补贴时,创新企业则表现出研发过度的行为特征,R&D投入与技术溢出水平正相关,在均衡定价策略下,企业过度研发行为受到抑制,社会福利水平最高. When a firm conducts product innovation, the upgraded product will be re-priced, and market competitive manner will be changed. As for that, introducing the asymmetric R&D behavior of duopoly into Hotelling model, and taking the product pricing strategy in traditional Hotelling model as an endogenous variable, it studies the two-stage R&D/product model under the condition of technological spillovers. It concludes that product innovation is an effective way to enhance firm's competitiveness, and discriminatory pricing is the dominant strategy for each firm. Under the equilibrium pricing strategy, the innovative firm shows the feature of "R&D inertia", and there is a negative relation between R&D input and technological spillovers. When the government provides R&D subsidies, the innovative firm shows the feature of "R&D excess", and a positive relation exists between firm's R&D input and technological spillovers. Under equilibrium pricing strategy, the finn's excessive R&D behavior is restrained and the social welfare reaches the highest level.
出处 《研究与发展管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期67-75,共9页 R&D Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70901043)
关键词 产品创新 技术溢出 单一定价 歧视定价 博弈论 product innovation technological spillovers uniform pricing discriminatory pricing game theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Hotelling H. Stability in competition [J]. Economic Journal,1929,39:41-57.
  • 2Aspremont C D, Gabszewicz J J, Thisse J F. On Hotelling' s "stability in competition" [ J]. Econometrica, 1979,47 : 1145-1151.
  • 3Economides N. Minimal and maximal product differentiation in Hotelling's duopoly [ J ]. Economics Letters, 1986,21 (6):67-71.
  • 4Tabuchi T, Thisse J F. Asymmetric equilibrium in spatial competition [ J ]. International of Industrial Organization, 1995,14(2) :213-227.
  • 5Liang W J, Wang H, Mai C C. Spatial discrimination: Bertrand vs. Cournot with asymmetric demands [ J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics ,2006,36:790-802.
  • 6D'Aspremont C, Jacquemin A. Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers [ J ]. American Economic Review, 1988,78 ( 5 ) : 1133-1137.
  • 7Kamien A, Muller E. Research joint venture and R&D Cartels [ J ]. American Economic Review, 1992,82 (5) : 1293-1306.
  • 8Amir R. Modelling imperfectly appropriable R&D via spillovers [ J ]. International Journal of Imtustrial Organization ,2000,18(7 ) : 1013-1032.
  • 9Jeong-Yoo Kim. Product compatibility and technological innovation [ J ]. International Economic Journal,2000, 14(3) :87-100.
  • 10Mohto M, Georgantzis N, Orts V. Cooperative R&D with endogenous technology differentiation [ J ]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy,2005,14 (2) :461-476.

二级参考文献75

  • 1卡尔·夏皮罗 哈尔·瓦里安 张帆译.信息规则--网络经济的策略指导[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000..
  • 2d'Aspremont C,Jacquemin A.Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers[J].American Economic Review,1988,78 (5):1133 ~ 1137.
  • 3Suzumura K.Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in oligopoly with spillovers[J].American Economic Review,1992,82(5):1307 ~ 1320.
  • 4Spencer B,Brander J.International R&D rivalry and industrial strategy[J].Review of Economic Studies,1983,50(163):707 ~ 722.
  • 5Qiu L D,Tao Z.Policy on international R&D cooperation:subsidy or tax?[J].European Economic Review,1998,42(9):1727 ~ 1750.
  • 6Hinloopen J.Subsidizing cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillover[J].Journal of Economics,1997,66 (2):151 ~175.
  • 7Poyago-Theotoky J.A note on endogenous spillovers in a nontournament R&D duopoly[J].Review of Industrial organization,1999,15(3):253 ~ 262.
  • 8Amir R,Evstigneev I,Wooders J.Noncooperative versus cooperative R&D with endogenous spillovers rates[J].Games and Economic Behavior,2003,42(2):183 ~ 207.
  • 9泰勒尔.产业组织理论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.529.
  • 10Katz M,Shapiro C.Network externalities,competition,and compatibility[J].American Economic Review,1985,75 (3):424-440.

共引文献121

同被引文献77

引证文献5

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部