摘要
目的对比分析常规心电图(ECG)和立体心电向量图(3D-VCG),评价3D-VCG在心肌梗死相关动脉(IRA)定位上的应用价值。方法 114例临床确诊心肌梗死患者,经冠状动脉造影,将冠状动脉单支完全闭塞或狭窄≥75%者,分成左前降支(LAD)、左回旋支(LCX)、右冠状动脉(RCA)共3个IRA组,分别分析其ECG和3D-VCG的分区定位特点。结果以3D-VCG心肌梗死诊断标准之前壁区定位LAD,高侧壁定位LCX,下壁定位RCA,阳性检出率高于常规ECG(分别为:91.7%比50%,75%比12.5%,70%比3.5%,均为P<0.01)。阴性检出率:LAD、LCX和RCA组3D-VCG显著低于ECG(2.7%比33.3%,2.1%比50%,0比30%,均为P<0.01)。结论 3D-VCG对心肌梗死IRA有定位诊断价值,且较常规ECG为优。
Objective To evaluate the value of 3-dimension electrocardiography (3D-VCG) in localizing the infarction related artery (IRA) in myocardial-infarction (MI). Methods A total of 114 MI cases with coronary arteriography were divided into 3 IRA (artery occlusion≥75% ) groups: 36 cases in left anterior descending artery (LAD) group, 48 cases in left circumflex artery (LCX) group and 30 cases in right coronary artel-y (RCA) group. 3D-VCGs and ECG of each patients were analyzed. Results There was significant deference both in positive and negative detective rate between 3D-VCG and ECG positive detective rate: LAD group: 91.7% vs. 50% in anterior wall (P 〈0. 01 ) ; LCX group: 75% vs. 12. 5% in high lateral wall(P〈0.01); RCA gruup: 70% vs. 6. 7% in inferior wall(P〈0.01); negative detective rate: The negative detectable rates of 3D-VCG in LAD, LCX and RCA groups were significantly lower than those of ECG (2.8% vs. 33.3%, P〈0.01; 2. 1% vs. 50%, P〈0.01; Ovs. 30%, P〈0.01).Conclusions In diagnosing and locating IRA, 3D-VCG is somehow more accurate than routine ECG.
出处
《中国心血管杂志》
2011年第2期109-111,共3页
Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
基金
卫生部科技中心专项课题(W201002)
关键词
心肌梗死
心电描记术
立体心电向量图
Myocardial infarction
Electrocardiography
3-Dimension vectrocardiography