期刊文献+

饮食干预对慢性荨麻疹患者影响的研究 被引量:4

Study on the impact of dietary intervention on the patients with chronic urticaria
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨饮食干预对由食物过敏原引起的慢性荨麻疹患者的影响。方法:选取慢性荨麻疹14种食物过敏原特异性IgG抗体阳性病例96例,随机分为干预组50例和对照组46例,两组均口服咪唑斯丁(皿治林),每日1片,连服28 d,干预组同时进行饮食干预。两组患者于第1日、28日、35日由专人评价皮损面积、发作频率、风团数量、瘙痒程度等指标。干预组中12例患者在饮食干预3个月行14种食物过敏原特异性IgG检测。结果:干预组第28日、35日有效率分别为84.0%、86.0%,对照组有效率为56.5%、45.7%,干预组治疗效果明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。12例患者在饮食干预后IgG检测结果与干预前相比阳性率降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:饮食干预可有效减轻由食物过敏原特异性IgG引起慢性荨麻疹患者的症状,并降低不耐受食物的阳性率、阳性级别。 Objective : To explore the impact of dietary intervention on the patients with chronic urticaria induced by food - allergen. Methods : 96 selected chronic urticaria patients whose IgG antibody of 14 kinds of food allergen specificity was positive were randomly divided into intervention group ( n = 50)and control group ( n = 46 ). The patients in both groups were given mizolastine orally, one tablet daily for 28 days and meanwhile the dietary intervention was conducted in the intervention group. The lesion size of skin, frequency of seizure, number of wheal, itching and other indicators were evaluated respectively on the first day, 28th day and 35th day in the two groups. 12 patients'IgG antibody was detected after the dietary intervention for 3 months in the intervention group. Results: The effective rates were respectively 84.0% and 86.0% on 28th day and 35th day in the intervention group, 56.5% and 45.7% in the control group. The treatment effect was better in the intervention group than the control group ( P 〈 O. 05 ) ; the IgG positive rate of 12 patients was lower after the intervention compared with that before intervention ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion: Dietary intervention can effectively reduce the symptoms of patients with chronic urticaria induced by food - allergen and decrease the positive rate and positive level of food intolerance.
作者 王霞 郭晓玲
出处 《齐鲁护理杂志(上旬刊)》 2011年第3期6-7,共2页 Journal of Qilu Nursing
关键词 慢性荨麻疹 IGG抗体 食物不耐受 过敏原 Chronic urticaria IgG antibodies Food intolerance Allergen
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1杨勤萍,陈连军,徐金华,郑志忠,张伟,吴瑞勤,毛玲娥,陈美娟,陈仁贵,温海,顾军,杨希惠,黄懿,罗东辉.氯雷他定治疗慢性荨麻疹93例临床疗效观察[J].临床皮肤科杂志,2004,33(1):50-50. 被引量:106
  • 2严利刚.咪唑斯汀(皿治林)治疗慢性荨麻疹疗效观察[J].临床皮肤科杂志,2003,32(4):230-231. 被引量:7
  • 3Bahna SL.Food allergy and intolerance. Pediatric Annals . 2006
  • 4Zar S,Kumar D,Kumar D.Role of food hypersensitivity in irrita-ble bowel syndrome. Minerva Medica . 2002
  • 5Breakey J.Is food intolerance due to an inborn error of metabo-lism?. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition . 2004
  • 6Fischer R,McGhee J R,Vu HL,et al.O-ral and nasal sensitization pro-mote distinct immuneresponses and lung reactivity in a mouse model ofpea-nut allergy. American Journal of Pathology . 2005

二级参考文献5

  • 1[1]Kay GG, Harris AG. Loratadine: a non-sedating antihistamine. Review of its effects on cognition, psychomotor performance, mood and sedation[J]. Clin Exp Allergy, 1999, 29(Suppl 3): 147-150.
  • 2[2]Simons FE, McMillan JL, Simons KJ. A double-blind, singledose, crossover comparison of cetirizine, terfenadine, loratadine,astemizole, and chlorpheniramine versus placebo: Suppressive effects on histamine-induced wheals and flares during 24 hours in normal subjects[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 1990, 86(4 Pt 1):540-547.
  • 3乔刚.咪唑斯汀治疗慢性荨麻疹,有效性与安全性评估[J].国外医学:皮肤性病学分册,2001,27(3):180-180.
  • 4朱大勋.咪唑斯汀和四种常用H_1受体阻滞剂的实验抗组胺强度比较[J].中华皮肤科杂志,2001,34(3):219-220. 被引量:36
  • 5郭在培,张谊之,冉玉平,刘宏杰.咪唑斯汀(皿治林)治疗慢性荨麻疹35例疗效观察[J].临床皮肤科杂志,2001,30(6):379-380. 被引量:23

共引文献111

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部