期刊文献+

反语回应论视角下的《傲慢与偏见》对白解读 被引量:1

Dialogue Analysis of Pride and Prejudice from the Perspective of the Echoic-Interpretation Theory of Irony
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在日常言语交际和书面文体中,人们经常会有意识或无意识地使用反语。这一语言现象引起了语言学家和认知心理学家们的关注,阐释反语的理论也层出不穷,其中有较大影响和说服力的是Sperber&Wilson(S&W)关联理论框架下的反语回应理论。本文通过对《傲慢与偏见》中的言语反讽分析来证明反语回应论对反语等传统修辞语言的强大阐释力,从而更好地理解Austen作品中独特的反讽艺术和机智幽默的语言魅力。 Consciously or unconsciously, people usually use irony in everyday speech communication and written genres. Verbal irony has been receiving considerable attention from linguists and cognitive psychologists. Theories of the interpretation of irony have been put forward, among which, Sperber & Wilson's Echoic - Interpretation Theory of Irony is most influential and convincing. This paper attempts to analyse verbal irony in Pride and Prejudice to prove that the Echoic - Interpretation Theory of Irony has powerful interpretation power to language, with which we can have a better understanding to the unique irony art and waggish language charm in Austen's works.
作者 康宇
出处 《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2011年第2期143-145,共3页 Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
关键词 反语 反语回应理论 言语反讽 irony Echoic - Interpretation Theory of Irony verbal irony
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1胡加圣.反讽理解的语境激活和最佳可及性标准——《傲慢与偏见》反讽话语之关联理论视角[J].外语与外语教学,2008(8):21-25. 被引量:15
  • 2严世清.论关联理论的隐喻观[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2002,25(2):7-11. 被引量:31
  • 3Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition[ M]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1995.
  • 4方伟琴.反语的语用和认知研究[J].北京第二外国语学院学报,2005,27(2):14-18. 被引量:9
  • 5Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. 1992. "On verbal irony" [J]. In Lingua 87, 1992:53 -76.
  • 6Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. Irony and the use -mention distinction [A]. In: P. Cole(ed. ) Radical Pragmatics[ C]. New York : Academic Press, 1981:295 - 318.
  • 7Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. Irony and relevance: A reply to Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi [ A]. In: Carston, R. &Uchida,S(eds. ). Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications [ C ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1998 : 283 - 293.
  • 8简·奥斯汀[英].Pride and Prejudice[ M ] English Edition.上海三联书店,2010:3,181-182,2,105-106.

二级参考文献38

  • 1严世清.隐喻理论史探[J].外国语,1995,18(5):27-31. 被引量:90
  • 2朱永生,严世清.语法隐喻理论的理据和贡献[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(2):95-102. 被引量:171
  • 3[1]Booth, W. C. A Rhetoric Of Irony [M]. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1974.
  • 4[2]Gibbs, R. W. (JR.). "Process and products in making sense of tropes" [A]. In Ortony. 2nd (ed.). Metaphor and Thought [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1993.
  • 5[3]Grice, P. H. "Logic and conversation" [A]. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics [C],Vol. 3: 9: Speech Acts, 41~58. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
  • 6[4]G rice, P. H. "Further notes on logic and conversation"[A]. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics [C], Vol. 3: 9: Pragmatics, 113~128. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
  • 7[5]Leech, G. Piciples of pragmatics [M]. London and NewYork: Longman Group Limited, 1983.
  • 8[6]Muecke, D. The Compass of irony [M].London: Methuen, 1969.
  • 9[7]Searle, J. R. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of SpeechActs [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1979.
  • 10[8]SETO, KEN- ICHI. "On non-echoic irony" [A]. In Carston R. & Uchida S. (ed.). Relevance Theory. Applications and Implications [C]. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1998.

共引文献52

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部