期刊文献+

颈椎动态稳定器治疗颈椎病的早期临床效果 被引量:6

Early clinical effect of dynamic cervical implant in treatment of cervical spondylosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察应用颈椎动态稳定器(dynamic cervical implant,DCI)治疗椎间盘退变所致颈椎病的早期临床效果。方法 2010年4~6月,8例颈椎间盘突出症患者均行椎间盘切除、椎管减压后DCI置入。观察手术前后颈椎正侧位、过伸过屈侧位X线片,测量患者手术前后C2~7、置入节段和置入邻近节段的活动范围(range of motion,ROM)。采用视觉模拟评量表(visual analog scale,VAS)评分、患者满意度(patient satisfaction index,PSI)分别评价患者手术前后的症状改善情况和满意度。结果患者术后上肢VAS评分平均改善4.8分,颈部VAS评分平均改善4.6分,术后患者PSI平均为1.8,手术有效率为100%。颈椎C2~7的ROM减少15.76°±16.00°,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);术后置入节段椎间隙的ROM减少2.14°±2.31°,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);术后邻近节段的ROM减少1.18°±5.05°,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论应用DCI治疗椎间盘退变所致颈椎病的早期疗效确切,能维持颈椎的稳定性并保留一定范围的生理活动度。 Objective To investigate the early clinical effect of dynamic cervical implant in the treatment of cervical spondylosis.Methods From April to June 2010,8 patients with cervical disc herniation underwent diskectomy,decompression and internal fixation with DCI.Pre-and postoperative roentgenographs were observed to measure range of motion(ROM) of C2~7,operative and adjacent segment.Visual analog scale(VAS) score and patient satisfaction index(PSI) were also evaluated.Results Compared with those before operation,the average VAS score improved 4.8 at upper limbs and 4.6 at neck after operation respectively.The average PSI was 1.8 one week after operation.Effective rate was 100%.The ROM of C2-7 decreased 15.76°±16.00°,and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05).The ROM of implant segment decreased 2.14°±2.31°,and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05).The ROM of adjacent segment decreased 1.18°±5.05°,and the difference wasn't statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusion Treatment of cervical spondylosis caused by intervertebral disc degeneration by cervical functional reconstruction with DCI internal fixation is effective,and it gives consideration to both stability and ROM.
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2010年第6期331-334,共4页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
关键词 颈椎 减压术 外科 椎间盘切除术 内固定器 Cervical vertebrae Decompression surgical Diskectomy Internal fixators
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Thome C, Leheta 0, Krauss JK, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of rectangular titanium cage fusion and iliae crest autograft fusion in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2006, 4(1):1 -9.
  • 2Elsawaf A, Mastronardi L, Roperto R, et al. Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2009, 32(2):215 -224.
  • 3Chang UK, Kim DH, Lee MC, et al. Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [ J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007, 7( 1 ) :40 -46.
  • 4Robertson JT, Papadopoulos SM, Traynelis VC. Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study[ J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2005, 3 (6) :417 -423.
  • 5Pickett GE, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, et al. Complications with cervical arthroplasty [ J ]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2006, 4 ( 2 ) : 98 - 105.
  • 6Duggal N. Cervical disc arthroplasty: a practical overview [ J ]. Curr Orthop Pract, 2009, 20(3) :216 -221.
  • 7Huang RC, Girardi FP, Lim MR, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery [ J ]. Orthop Clin Noah Am, 2005, 36(3) :263 -269.
  • 8Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain [ J]. Lancet, 1974, 2 (7889) :1127 - 1131.
  • 9Robinson RA, Smith GW. Anterolateral cervical disc removal and interbody fusion for cervical disc syndrome [ J ]. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1955, 95( 1 ) : 223 -224.
  • 10Cloward liB, The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks[J]. J Neurosurg, 1958, 15(6) :602 -617.

二级参考文献2

共引文献95

同被引文献43

  • 1吴学建,皮国富,王利民,陈风苞,王以进.高分子聚乙烯颈椎融合器的生物力学特性研究[J].中华实验外科杂志,2004,21(7):860-862. 被引量:5
  • 2曾岩,党耕町,马庆军.颈椎前路融合术后颈部运动功能的评价[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(24):1481-1484. 被引量:96
  • 3侯勇.针推排位法治疗各型颈椎病及184例疗效观察[J].四川生理科学杂志,2005,27(2):84-85. 被引量:2
  • 4张巍巍,张怀学,余华伟,苏鹏,陈敬忠,钟传山,罗肖,黄亮,刘全.颈椎损伤伴颈椎间盘突出的疗效观察[J].西部医学,2007,19(1):115-116. 被引量:1
  • 5Nasca RJ. Cervical radiculopathy: current diagnostic and treatment options. J Surg Orthop Adv,2009,18 (1) :13-18.
  • 6Kulkarni V, Rajshekhar V, Raghuram L. Accelerated spondylotic changes adjacent to the fused segment foIlowing central cervical corpectomy magnetic resonance maging study evidence. Neurosurg, 2004,100(1 Suppl Spine) :2-6.
  • 7Suqawara T, Itoh Y, Hirano Y, et al. Lonq term outcome and adjacent disc deaeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with titanium cylindrical cages. Acla Neumchir (Wien), 2009,151 (4) :303-309.
  • 8Barrels R, Donk R. Fusion around cervical disc prosthesis: case report. Neurosurgery,2005,57(1) :194.
  • 9Bohlman HH,Emery SE,Goodfellow DB. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy.Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients[J].{H}Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume,1993,(9):1298-1307.
  • 10Wigfield C,Gill S,Nelson R,et a1. Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease[J].{H}Journal of Neurosurgery,2002,(l Suppl):17-21.

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部