期刊文献+

腰椎间盘置换术后椎间活动度与相邻节段退变之间的关系 被引量:2

Relationship between range of motion and adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究人工椎间盘置换术后椎间活动范围(range of motion,ROM)与相邻节段退变(adjacent segment degeneration,ASD)之间的关系。方法 1999年12月~2006年12月,44例腰椎退行性疾病患者接受人工椎间盘置换术,其中男18例,女26例;年龄为36~58岁,平均42.3岁。椎间盘退行性病变3例,椎间盘退行性病变合并腰椎椎间盘突出32例,椎间盘突出术后复发9例。手术节段为:L3/L4节段3例,L4/L5节段23例,L5/S1节段18例。对所有患者随访2年以上,测量随访时手术节段和相邻节段的ROM,评价ASD征象,记录手术前后以及末次随访时患者视觉模拟量表(visual analog scale,VAS)评分和Oswestry功能障碍评分。对上述数据进行统计学分析。结果所有患者随访2.0~7.5年,平均5.6年。44例手术患者中5例有ASD征象(11%)。患者末次随访时均无临床症状。所有患者术后ROM为3.6°±1.7°,其中ASD患者的ROM为2.2°±0.8°,无ASD患者的ROM为4.6°±1.5°,二者间的差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。患者VAS疼痛评分和Oswestry功能障碍评分与影像学检查有无退变无相关性(P〉0.05)。结论人工腰椎椎间盘置换术后相邻节段有退变征象的患者手术节段的ROM低,但相邻节段有无退变与临床疗效无相关性,可能与随访病例数较少及时间较短有关。 Objective To determine the relationship between range of motion(ROM) and adjacent segment degeneration(ASD) after lumbar total disc replacement.Methods From December 1999 to December 2006,44 patients including 18 males and 26 females underwent total disc replacement,the average age of whom was 42.3 years old(36-58 years old).Results of primary diagnosis were degenerative disc disease in 3 patients and degenerative disc disease accompanied with disc herniation in 32 patients,recurrent herniation after discectomy in 9 patients.Intervertebral discs were replaced at L3/L4 in 3 patients,L4/L5 in 23 patients,L5/S1 in 18 patients.All patients were followed up over 2 years.At the final follow-up,data of ROM at surgical segments and adjacent segments were measured,while ASD signs was observed.All the patients were evaluated according to visual analogue scale(VAS) scores and Oswestry disability scores pre-and postoperatively and at the final follow-up.All data were analyzed statistically.Results All 44 patients were followed up for 2.0-7.5 years(mean 5.6 years),and ASD signs were occurred in 5(11%) patients.No clinical symptom occurred at the final follow-up.The ROM of all patients was 3.3°±2.1°.The ROM was 2.8°±1.3° in the patients with ASD and 4.8°±1.5° in the patients without ASD,and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05).There was no statistically significant relationship between ASD and clinical outcome in this small sample size-study(P0.05).Conclusion ROM of surgical segment of patients with ASD after lumbar total disc replacement is lower.But no relationship exist between ASD and clinical curative effect,which may be correlated to the small sample size.
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2010年第6期335-338,共4页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
基金 首都医学发展科研基金(2007-2058)
关键词 腰椎 椎间盘 椎间盘切除术 假体植入 活动范围 关节 Lumbar vertebrae Intervertebral disk Diskectomy Prosthesis implantation Range of motion articular
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, et al. Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty[ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976), 2008. 33 ( 15 ) : 1701 - 1707.
  • 2Huang RC, Tropiano P, Marnay T, et al. Range of motion andadjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement [ J]. Spine J, 2006, 6 (3) :242 - 247.
  • 3Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain[J]. Lancet, 1974, 2(7889) : 1127 -1131.
  • 4Chow JH, Chan CC. Validation of the Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index [ J ]. Work, 2005, 25 (4) : 307 - 314.
  • 5Christensen FB, Hansen ES, Eiskjaer SP, et al. Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patients[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) , 2002, 27 ( 23 ) :2674 - 2683.
  • 6Fritzell P, H@,g 0,: Nordwall A, et al. Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain : comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2003, 12(2) :178 -189.
  • 7Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim YS, et al. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments : a biomechanical analysis [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ) , 2003, 28 (14) : 1560 - 1566.
  • 8Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RIJ, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of ktmbar total discreplacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion : part I : evaluation of clinical outcomes [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976) , 2005, 30 ( 14 ) :1565 - 1575.
  • 9鲁世保,王庆一,海涌,苏庆军,康南,张岑山.人工腰椎间盘置换术中期疗效分析[J].中华外科杂志,2008,46(5):342-345. 被引量:8
  • 10David T. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32(6):661 -666.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Gillet P. The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003, 16:338-345,
  • 2Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004, 86 : 1497-1503.
  • 3Geisler FH. Surgical technique of lumbar artificial disc replacement with the Charite artificial disc. Neurosurgery, 2005, 56( 1 Suppl) :46-57.
  • 4Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty : an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine,2003, 28 Suppl : S110-117.
  • 5Blumenthal SL, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part Ⅰ: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine, 2005, 30: 1565-1575.
  • 6Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, et al. Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc Ⅱ after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003, 16:362- 368.
  • 7David T. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine, 2007, 32:661-666.
  • 8Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Ali el-H, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech,2005, 18:353-359.
  • 9Christoph J, Michael M, Karsten W, et al. Clinical Results of Total Lumbar Disc Replacement With ProDisc Ⅱ. Spine, 2006, 31 : 1923-1932.
  • 10Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV, et al. Charite total disc replacement: clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J, 2006, 15:183-195.

共引文献7

同被引文献49

  • 1海涌,周建伟,彭军,吴继功,姬勇.腰椎融合区相邻节段无症状退变椎间盘的转归[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(11):645-647. 被引量:3
  • 2李淳德,于峥嵘,刘宪义,李宏.腰椎内固定融合术后邻近节段退变的影响因素[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(4):246-248. 被引量:38
  • 3金大地,赵亮,瞿东滨,陈建庭,江建明.腰椎间盘人工髓核置换术后中期疗效分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(5):326-330. 被引量:21
  • 4Adoqwa O, Owens R, Karikari I, et al. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosisi. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis [ J]. Neurosurg Spine, 2012,24(5 ) : 1343- 1351.
  • 5Kim H J, Kang K T, Moon S H, et al. The quantitative as- sessment of risk factors to overstress at adjacent segments after lumbar fusion: removal of posterior ligments and pedi- cle screws[J]. Spine, 2011,36(17) :1367-1373.
  • 6Katsimihas M, Bailey C S, Issa K, et al. Prospective clini- cal and radiographic results of charite Ⅲ artificial total disc arthroplasty at 2-to 7-year follow-up: a Canadian experience [J]. Can J Surg, 2010,53(6) :408-414.
  • 7Diwan A D, Parvataneni H K, Khan S N, et al. Current concepts in intervertebral disc restoration [ J ]. Spine Serv- ice, 2000,31(3):453-464.
  • 8Shim C S, Lee S H, Park C W, et al. Partial disc replacement with the PDN prosthetic disc nucleus device: early clinical re- salts[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003,16(4):324-330.
  • 9Ghiselli G G, Wang J C, Bhatia N N, et al. Adjacent seg- ment degeneration in the lumbar spine [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004, 86(7) : 1497- 1503.
  • 10Gillet P. The fate of adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003,16(4) :338-345.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部