期刊文献+

基于logistic模型族的不良贷款极端零回收强度模型研究 被引量:4

Extreme Zero Recovery Rate Analysis Based on Family of Logistic Models
原文传递
导出
摘要 不良贷款能否有回收是其定价、日常管理和回收策略的决定因素之一,而宏观经济和处置时效则是影响不良贷款能否有回收的双重利刃。本文依据我国最大的不良贷款数据库——LossMetricsTM数据库,利用logistic模型族对清收时间跨度为2001-2008年的不良贷款零回收强度的动态变化影响因素进行了研究,并在研究中针对不同的样本分别建立了子模型和全模型,对多个模型的结果进行了对比。在全时间跨度模型中分析了GDP增速与零回收强度的直接关系;并把单笔贷款回收处置时间跨度分为小于12个月、12-22个月、23-60个月和超过60个月四组子样本,针对子样本分别建立模型,分析影响其各自零回收强度因素的区别。结果表明:GDP增速在大部分模型与零回收强度为显著负相关关系;在大部分子模型中不良贷款的有效抵质押因素显著,但在不同处置时间的子模型中显著情况有所不同。通过对零回收强度的研究可更好的结合宏观经济和处置时间来制订有效科学的回收策略。 Whether the non-performing loan is zero recovery rate or not is one of the most important things for its pricing,management and disposal strategy.Macroeconomic factors and disposal effects will both affect the recovery rate.Based on LossMetricsTM,this paper use family of logistic models to analyze the hazard rate of zero recovery non-performing loans from 2001 to 2008.We analyze the relationship between macroeconomic factors and the zero recovery loans for the whole sample,and we divide the time of disposition into four subsamples,that is less than 12 months,12-22 months,23-60 months and more than 60 months,and contribute models for the four different subsamples.The results show that the relationship between GDP growth and zero recovery rate is negative,collateral factors are significant in most models for subsamples,but in the models the effects are different.Analyzing the relationship between macroeconomic factors and disposal effect will help us to develop effective recovery strategy
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期16-23,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(2007CB814902) 国家基金委海外杰出青年基金(10628104) 国家基金委创新研究群体(10721101) 国家水利部公益性项目(200801027) 中央财经大学"211工程"三期资助项目 中央财经大学青年科研创新团队基金资助项目
关键词 不良贷款 零回收强度 logistic模型族 GDP增速 处置效应 extreme zero recovery rate family of logistic GDP growth effect of disposition
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Altman, E. , Kishore,V.. Almost everything you wan- ted to know about recoveries on defaulted bonds[J]. Fi nancial Analysts Journal, 1996,(52): 57-64.
  • 2Pykhtin, M.. Unexpected recovery risk[J]. Risk. , 2003,(8) :74-78.
  • 3Frye,J.. Depressing recoveries[J]. Risk, 2000, (13):108-111.
  • 4Jacobs, A.. Measuring LGD on commercial loans: An 18 years internal study[J]. RMA Journal, 2004, (86): 28-35.
  • 5Dermine,J. , Neto,C. ,Carvalho,D.. Bank loan losses-given-default.. A case study[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2006, (30) : 1219-1243.
  • 6陈浩等.基于支持向量机的不良贷款回收判别分析[J].系统工程理论与实,2009,(12):23-30.
  • 7Tang, Y. , Chen, M.Z. , ChenM. , Yang, X.G.. Discriminant analysis about zero recovery of NPL:An em- pirical studying on china's experience[J] ,Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences, 2009, (3) : 10-26.
  • 8Bhansali, V. , Gingrich, R. , Francis. A.. Systemic Cred it Risk.. What is the market telling us [J]? Financial Analysts Journal, 2008, (4):16-24.
  • 9Dermine, J. , Carvalho,C. N. D.. Bank loan losses-giv- en-default: A case study[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2006,(30) :1219-1243.
  • 10刘宏峰,杨晓光.违约损失率的估计:发达国家的经验及启示[J].管理评论,2003,15(6):23-27. 被引量:15

二级参考文献25

  • 1武剑.内部评级法中的违约损失率(LGD)模型——新资本协议核心技术研究[J].国际金融研究,2005(2):15-22. 被引量:27
  • 2沈沛龙,崔婕.内部评级法中违约损失率的度量方法研究[J].金融研究,2005(12):86-95. 被引量:19
  • 3Altman, E. and V. Kishore. Almost Everything You Wanted To Know About Recoveries On Defaulted Bonds.Financial Analysts Journal, Nov/Dec, 1996. 57-64
  • 4Altman, E. and H. Suggitt Default rotes in the syndicated bank loan market: A mortality analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2000. 24(1,2), 229-253
  • 5Altman, E., B. Brady, A. Resti and A. Sironi The Link between Default and Recovery Rates: Implications for Credit Risk Models and Procyclicality. NYU Stern School Salomon Center Working Paper. 2002
  • 6Amihud, Yakov, Kenneth Garbade and Marcel Kahan. An Institutional Innovation to Reduce Agency Costs of Public Corporate Bonds. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2000. Spring, 114-121
  • 7Asarnow, Elliot and David Edwards, Measuring Loss on Defaulted Bank Loans: A 24-Year Study. Journal of Commercial Lending, 1995. 77(7), 11-23
  • 8Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The New Basel Capital Accord, 2003. www.bis.org
  • 9Frye, J. Depressing Recoveries, Chicago Fed working paper, an abridged version appeared in Risk, November. 2000
  • 10Grossman, R., S. O'Shea, and S. Bonelli. Bank Loan and Bond Recovery Study: 1997-2000. Fitch Loan Products Special Report, March 2001

共引文献20

同被引文献53

  • 1叶晓可,刘海龙.银行不良贷款违约损失率结构特征研究[J].上海管理科学,2006,28(6):12-15. 被引量:21
  • 2汪办兴.中国银行贷款违约损失率影响因素的实证分析[J].经济评论,2007(3):90-93. 被引量:10
  • 3马宇超 陈暮紫 陈敏 杨晓光.大规模同质不良贷款资产组合的回收率估计方法.管理科学学报,2009,:86-96.
  • 4Altman,E. ,Brady, B. ,Resti. A. etc. The link between default and recovery rates.. Theory, empirical evidence, and implications[J]. Journal of Business, 2005,78 (6) : 2203--2227.
  • 5Grunert,J. , Weber, M.. Recovery rates of commercial lending: empirical evidence for German companies[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2008,33(3):505--513.
  • 6Hu, Y. , Perraudin, W.. The dependence of recovery rates and defaults [R]. Working paper, Birkbeck Col- lege, 2002.
  • 7Dullmann,K. , Trapp, M.. Systematic risk in recovery rates-an empirical analysis of U. S. corporate credit ex- posures[R]. Working paper, 2004, February.
  • 8Gupton,G. , Stein,R.. Losscalc V2: dynamic prediction of LGD[R]. Working paper, Moody's KMV, January 2005.
  • 9Rosch, D. , Scheule, H.. A multi-factor approach for systematic default and recovery risk[J]. The Journal of Fixed Income, 2005, 15(2) :63--75.
  • 10Frye, J.. Depressing recoveries[J]. Risk, 2000, 11: 108--111.

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部