期刊文献+

创伤性颈脊髓损伤围手术护理质量指标的临床应用 被引量:3

Clinical Application of Nursing Quality Index in Perioperation Nursing for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨创伤性颈脊髓损伤围手术专病护理质量评价指标的临床应用。方法将创伤严重度评分(in-jury severity socre,ISS)≥10的136例颈脊髓损伤病人随机分为两组,在围手术期分别采用常规护理质量指标和专病护理质量指标控制护理质量,观察两组病例ISS、护士及时发现病情变化数、并发症发生数、早期功能锻炼时间、抢救天数、住院天数、死亡例数,同时观察两组病例特殊临床表现。结果两组在护士及时发现病情变化数、并发症发生数、早期功能锻炼时间、抢救天数、住院天数之间的比较均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论在创伤性颈脊髓损伤围手术期应用专病护理质量指标控制护理质量,对病员早期康复有重要作用,能提高抢救成功率,缩短住院时间,减轻病人经济负担,提升专科护理水平。 Objective To investigate the clinical application of perioperation nursing quality index for traumatic and spinal cord injury.Methods A total of 136 patients with cervical spinal cord injury and injury severity score(ISS) above 10 were randomly divided into two group.Usual index of nursing quality and special index of nursing quality were adopt respectively in the two groups.The ISS scores,number of cases whose disease changes were found by nurses in time,number of cases of complications,early exercise time,rescue days,hospitalization days,number of dead cases,and special clinical manifestations were observed.Results Significant differences were found in number of cases whose disease changes were found by nurses in time,number of cases of complications,early exercise time,rescue days and hospitalization days between two groups(P0.05).Conclusion The special index of perioperation nursing quality used for traumatic and spinal cord injury is crutial in early rehabilitation of the patients,can enhance the success rate of rescue,shorten the hospitalization stay,reduce the financial burden of the patients,and raise the level of special nursing.
出处 《华南国防医学杂志》 CAS 2011年第2期135-137,共3页 Military Medical Journal of South China
关键词 创伤 颈脊髓 手术治疗 质量指标 Traumatic Cervical spinal cord Surgical operation Quality index
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献80

共引文献204

同被引文献35

  • 1成翼娟,岳树锦,谷波,冯先琼,李继平,宋锦平.护理质量标准及评价体系的研究现状和趋势[J].护理管理杂志,2005,5(5):18-22. 被引量:75
  • 2段丽丽.当前我国护理质量评价的现状及改进方法[J].护理管理杂志,2007,7(4):23-25. 被引量:28
  • 3骨科常见疼痛的处理专家建议[J].中华骨科杂志,2008,28(1):78-81. 被引量:211
  • 4Cordon DB, Dahl JL, Miaskowski C, et al. American Pain Society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain n-nagement: American Pain Society quality of care task force[J]. Arch Intern Med,2005,165(14) :1574-1580.
  • 5Mize C, Bently G, Hubbard S. Standards of care: integrating nursing care plans and quality assurance activities[ J]. Clinical Issues, 199i ,2( 1 ) :68-69.
  • 6Gallagher RM, Rowell PA. Claiming the future of nursing through nursing sensitive quality indicators[J]. NAQ,2003,27(1) :273- 287.
  • 7Jamison RN, Ross MJ, Hoopman P, et al. Assessment of postoperative pain mangement: patient satisfaction and perceived helpfulness[ J]. Clin J Pain, 1997,13:229-236.
  • 8Innis J, Bikannieks N, Petryshen P, et al. Patient satisfaction and pain management: an educational approach[J]. J Nurs Care Qual,2004 ,19 :322-327.
  • 9Donabedian A. Definition of quality and approaches to its assessment and monitoring [ M ]. Ann Harbor: Health Administration Press, 1950:12-20.
  • 10胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1941:360.

引证文献3

二级引证文献118

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部