期刊文献+

DEP方案治疗34例晚期胃癌的临床观察

Clinical observation of DEP regimen as therapy for 34 patients with advanced gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了观察多西紫杉醇联合表柔比星加顺铂(DDP)方案(DEP)治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效和毒副反应,对入组的34例晚期胃癌患者给予表柔比星50 mg/m2,d1,多西紫杉醇75 mg/m2,d2,DDP 25 mg/m2,d3~d53周方案全身化疗。34例患者中完全缓解(CR)5例(14.71%),部分缓解(PR)15例(44.12%),稳定(SD)6例(17.65%),进展(PD)8例(23.53%),总有效率(CR+PR)为58.82%(20/34),疾病控制率(CR+PR+SD)为76.47%(26/34)。毒副反应主要为骨髓抑制,发生率为94.12%(32/34),其中Ⅲ、Ⅳ级占29.41%,无治疗相关性死亡。初步研究结果提示,PEP方案治疗晚期胃癌疗效肯定,虽然骨髓抑制等不良反应偏高,但有一定的治疗优势,值得进一步在临床中推广应用。 The objective of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and epirubicin plus cisplatin regimen(DEP) in patient with advanced gastic cancer.Totally 34 patients were consecutively enrolled in this study.Epirubicin 50 mg/m2,iv,d1 and Docetaxel 75 mg/m2,iv,d2,plus cisplatin 25 mg/m2,iv,d3-d5 were administered every three weeks.There are 5 cases CR(14.71%) and 15 cases PR(44.12%),6 cases SD(17.65%) and 8 cases PD(23.53%).Overall response rate(CR+PR) was 58.82%(20/34).Disease control rate was 76.47%(26/34).And 94.12%(32/34) patients experienced bone marrow suppression,of them 29.41% were grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ,which was the most common and serious toxicity.There were no direct treatment-related deaths.In conclusion,docetaxel and epirubicin plus cisplatin regimen(DEP) is active in patient with advanced gastric cancer.Despite its severe hematotoxicity,this regimen has some superiority.It consides that this regimen is feasible and might warrant further investigation in patient with advanced gastic cancer.
作者 董玉亭 孟琦
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 2010年第22期1884-1885,共2页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 胃肿瘤/药物疗法 多西紫杉醇 表阿霉素 顺铂 药物疗法 联合 gastric neoplasms/drug therapy docetaxel epirubicin cisplatin drug therapy combination
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献11

  • 1王启俊,祝伟星,袁光亮.2001年北京地区癌症死亡预测[J].中华流行病学杂志,1995,16(4):195-198. 被引量:6
  • 2杨建伟,陈奕贵,陈强,范南峰,郭增清,蔡雄超,吴晓安,许慎,吕霞,张映红,欧阳学农.以紫杉醇为主的联合化疗方案治疗进展期胃癌随机对照研究[J].癌症,2005,24(12):1531-1536. 被引量:10
  • 3WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment [M].Geneva (Switzerland):World Health Organization,1979.
  • 4Duffaud F,Therasse P.New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors[J].Bull Cancer,2000,87(12):869-870.
  • 5James K,Eisenhauer E,Christian M,et al.Measuring response in solid tumors:unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,1999,91(6):523-528.
  • 6Mazumdar M,Smith A,Schwartz LH.A statistical simulation study finds discordance between WHO criteria and RECIST guideline[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2004,57(4):358-365.
  • 7Therasse P,Arbuck SG,Eisenhauer EA,et al.New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors [J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92(3):179-181.
  • 8Werner-Wasik M,Xiao Y,Pequignot E,et al.Assessment of lung cancer response after nonoperative therapy:tumor diameter,bidimensional product,and volume.A serial CT sean-based study[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2001,51(1):56-61.
  • 9Prasad SR,Saini S,Sumner JE,et al.Radiological measurement of breast cancer metastases to lung and liver:comparison between WHO (bidimensional) and RECIST (unidimensional) guidelines [J].J Comput Assist Tomogr,2003,27(3):380-384.
  • 10Trillet-Lenoir V,Freyer G,Kaemmerlen P,et al.Assessment of tumour response to chemotherapy for metastatic coloreetal cancer:accuracy of the RECIST criteria[J].BrJ Radiol,2002,75(899):903-908.

共引文献516

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部