期刊文献+

格兰杰伪因果关系检验的小样本性质研究 被引量:2

Small Sample Properties of the Granger Spurious Causality Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于MC模拟方法研究了格兰杰伪因果关系的小样本性质,结果表明伪因果关系的发生概率会随着数据过程持久性的增强而增大,但会随着样本容量的增加而减少,且由于检验式的设定使得经Newey-West修正的检验方法并没有明显优势。通过解释变量和被解释变量的持久性对伪因果关系的影响以及与OLS估计的伪回归比较分析,表明随机干扰项的自相关或异方差是产生伪因果关系的主要原因,这为解决伪回归和伪因果关系问题提供了统一研究框架。 This paper studies the small sample properties of Granger spurious causality test based on Monte-Carlo simulation methods,the results show that the probability of finding Granger causal relation increases with the persistence of data process,but the probability decreases with sample size.The Granger causality test modified by the Newey-West methods has no significant advantage over the traditional Granger test owing to the specification of Granger test equation.The paper studies that the persistence of explanatory and explained variables has effects on the Granger spurious causality,and it shows that the autocorrelation or heteroskedasticity of random error term is the most important factor resulting in spurious causality through comparing with spurious regression based on OLS method,which provides a unified research framework on spurious causality and spurious regression.
作者 刘天祥
出处 《统计与信息论坛》 CSSCI 2011年第4期7-13,共7页 Journal of Statistics and Information
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目<无漂移平稳时间序列下伪回归的统一研究框架:基于改进的HAC方法>(10YJA790113)
关键词 格兰杰检验 伪因果关系 HAC方法 伪回归 MC模拟 Granger causal test spurious causality HAC method spurious regression Monte-Carlo simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Granger C W J. Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods[J]. Econometrica, 1969, 37(3).
  • 2He Zonglu, Koichi Maekawa. On Spurious Granger Causality[J].Economics Letters, 2001, 73(3).
  • 3Roberts David L, Nord Stephen. Causality Tests and Functional Form Sensitivity[J].Applied Economics, 1985, 17 (1).
  • 4Heejoon Kang. The Effects of Detrending in Granger Causality Tests [J]. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1985, 3(4).
  • 5Luintel Kul B. Non-causality Due to Irrelevant Lag Polynomials [J]. Applied Economics Letters, 1999, 6(1).
  • 6Lutkepohl Helmut. Non-causality Due to Omitted Variables[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1982, 19(2).
  • 7庞皓,陈述云.格兰杰因果检验的有效性及其应用[J].统计研究,1999,16(11):42-46. 被引量:34
  • 8周建,李子奈.Granger因果关系检验的适用性[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2004,44(3):358-361. 被引量:126
  • 9王立平,龙志和.基于Granger原因的因果关系检验方法评析[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2005,28(4):430-434. 被引量:17
  • 10曹永福.格兰杰因果性检验评述[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,23(1):155-160. 被引量:93

二级参考文献55

  • 1马薇,王键.计量经济模型伪回归表现形式及其易生经济变量研究[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2005,25(6):52-55. 被引量:12
  • 2(美)萨金特 王小明等(译).宏观经济理论[M].中国经济出版社,1998..
  • 3李拉亚.通货膨胀与不确定性[M].中国人民大学出版社,1994..
  • 4Chan, K.S. , H. Tong. , 1985, Amultiple threshold model AR (1) model[J]. Journal of Applied Probability, No. 2, 267-279.
  • 5Granger, C.W.J. and P. Newbold, 1974, Spurious Regressions in Economics [J], Journal of Econometrics, No. 2, 111-120.
  • 6Phillips, P.C. B, 1986, Understanding Spurious Regressions in Econometrics [J], Journal of Econometrics, No. 3, 311-340.
  • 7Entorf, H. , 1997, Random Walks with Drifts.. Nonsense Regression and Spurious Fixed -Effect Estimation [J]. Journal of Econometrics, No. 2, 287-296.
  • 8Phillips, P.C. B, 1998, New Tools for Understanding Spurious Regressions [J].Econometrica, No. 6, 1299- 1325.
  • 9Granger, C.W.J., N. Hyung and Y. Jeon. , 1998, Spurious Regressions with Stationary Series [J], Department of Economics, USCD, Working Paper.
  • 10Kim, Tae- Hwan. , Young - Sook. Lee and P. Newbold. , 2004, Spurious Regressions with Stationary Processes Around Linear Trends [J], Economics Letters, No. 2, 257-262.

共引文献242

同被引文献27

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部