摘要
由于Dempster组合规则所存在的不足,在组合冲突信息时,会得出与直觉相反的结论。针对Zadeh悖论,Haenni给出了反驳,但冲突产生的原因分析不够全面。鉴于此,本文在他们的基础上,总结出冲突产生的原因,它不仅与传感器受干扰有关,与识别框架不完整也有关系,其中识别框架不完整还包括框架中的元素不详尽,出现了新目标和在两两证据进行推理过程中目标丢失导致的潜在冲突。
D-S evidence theory is a very useful tool in dealing with uncertainty problems,but counter-intuitive results are often obtained in intelligent reasoning.Haenni gave some confutation based on Zadeh＇s criticism of Dempster rule of combination.However,the reasons for conflict among evidences given by Haenni are not comprehensive.In this paper,the reasons for conflict among evidences are analyzed and summarized.One reason is that sensors are disturbed.The other is that the framework is not integrated,which also includes incomplete elements in the framework,new objects outside the framework,and lost objects leading to potential conflict in the reasoning process of two evidences.
出处
《信息与电子工程》
2011年第2期219-223,共5页
information and electronic engineering
基金
国家自然科学基金重点项目(61032001)
国家自然科学基金资助项目(60572161
60972160)
全国优秀博士论文作者专项资金资助项目(200443)
