期刊文献+

基于融资受限和对冲需求的企业现金持有政策在产品市场竞争中的作用 被引量:17

Effects of Firms' Cash Holdings in Product Market Competition Based on Financial Constraints and Hedging Needs
原文传递
导出
摘要 资本市场存在融资摩擦,这种摩擦在未来现金流不确定的环境中会影响企业现金持有政策在产品市场竞争中的作用。本文在对融资受限程度和对冲需求量化的基础上,分析了这两个要素在现金持有对产品市场竞争绩效作用过程中的影响,发现在融资受限的情况下,持有较多现金对其在产品市场上的竞争具有更明显的积极作用。而当企业现金流和投资机会的相关关系很低时,企业对冲需求很高,更偏好存钱,高对冲需求企业的现金持有决策对其产品市场竞争绩效具有更明显的积极作用。此外,行业竞争特征和企业竞争地位也影响了竞争结果的产生,在垄断程度较高的行业中,企业的融资受限和对冲需求对现金持有决策的作用影响更大,而行业竞争领先者的融资受限和对冲需求在现金持有对企业产品市场竞争绩效的影响中作用小于行业竞争落后者。 Financial frictions in capital market affect the role that firms' cash holdings play in product market competition. Based on the measure of financial constraints and hedging needs,we analyze the impacts of these two factors affecting firms' cash holdings.It shows that financially constrained firms will get more market share if they hold more cash reserves.And when the correlation between a firm's cash flow and its investment opportunities is low,its hedging needs is high and it prefers reserving cash,so more cash holdings of firms with high hedging needs have more significantly positive effects on firms' competitive performance.Moreover,both industrially competitive characteristics and firms' competitive status influence the competitive results.Financial constrainta and hedging needs have greater effects on firms' cash holdings in more monopolistic industries.Financial constraints and hedging needs of industrial leaders have fewer effects on firms' cash holdings.
出处 《系统工程》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期63-73,共11页 Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(71031004)
关键词 财务管理 实证研究 融资受限 对冲需求 现金持有 产品市场竞争绩效 Financial Management Empirical Research Financial Constrain Hedging Needs Cash holdings Product Market Performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Brander J, et al. Oligopoly and financial structure:The limited liability effect[J]. American Economic Review, 1986,76:956~970.
  • 2Campello M. Capital structure and product markets interactions: Evidence from business cycles [J]. Journal of Financial Economies, 2003,68 : 353 ~ 378.
  • 3Campello M. Debt financing: Does it boost or hurt firm performance in product markets? [J]. Journal of Financial Economies, 2006,82 : 135 ~ 172.
  • 4朱武祥,陈寒梅,吴迅.产品市场竞争与财务保守行为——以燕京啤酒为例的分析[J].经济研究,2002,37(8):28-36. 被引量:210
  • 5刘志彪,姜付秀,卢二坡.资本结构与产品市场竞争强度[J].经济研究,2003,38(7):60-67. 被引量:286
  • 6屈耀辉,姜付秀,陈朝晖.资本结构决策具有战略效应吗?[J].管理世界,2007,23(2):69-75. 被引量:60
  • 7Acharya V V, Almeida H, Campello M. Is cash negative debt? A hedging perspective on corporate financial policies [J]. . Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2007,16 : 515 ~ 554.
  • 8Telser L G. Cutthroat competition and the long purse [J]. Journal of Law and Economies, 1966, 9: 259~ 277.
  • 9Benoit J. Financially constrained entry in a game with incomplete information[J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1984,15 : 490~ 499.
  • 10Bolton P, et al. A theory of predation based on agency problems in financial contracting [J]. American Economic Review, 1990,80: 93~106.

二级参考文献40

  • 1赵蒲,孙爱英.财务保守行为:基于中国上市公司的实证研究[J].管理世界,2004,20(11):109-118. 被引量:70
  • 2刘端,陈收.股票价格对中国上市公司投资行为的影响——基于不同股权依赖型公司的实证[J].管理评论,2006,18(1):31-36. 被引量:28
  • 3戴维·贝赞可 等.《公司战略经济学》 中译本[M].北京大学出版社,1999..
  • 4多纳德·海 等.《产业经济学与组织(上、下)》 中译本[M].经济科学出版社,2001..
  • 5John S. Hughes , Jennifer L. Kao and Arijit Mukherji, 1998, Oligopoly, Financial Structure, and Resolution of Uncertainty, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Vol.7,Num. l, Spring, pp67--88.
  • 6Phillips Gordon, 1995, Increased Debt and Industry Product Markets : An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Financial Economics 37, pp89--238.
  • 7Monika Schnitzer and Achim Wambach, 1998, Inside Versus Outside Financing and Product Market Competition, Discussion Paper of the Munich Economics Department, No.98--25.
  • 8Showaher Dean, 1995, Oligopoly and Financial Structure: Comment, American Economic Review, Vol.85, No.3, pp647--653.
  • 9Barclay Michael, Clifford Smith and Ross Watts, 1995, The Determinants of Corporate Leverage and Dividend Policies, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 7, pp4--19.
  • 10Brander James and Tracy Lewis, 1986, Oligopoly and Financial Structure : the limited Liability Effect, American Economic Review 76,pp956--970.

共引文献481

同被引文献325

引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部