期刊文献+

论在我国保险法上确立合理期待原则 被引量:10

On establishing the reasonable expectation principle in China′s Insurance Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国保险法上的"满足被保险人的合理期待"的法律理念自提出并被不少国家逐渐接受后,目前已发展成为一种全新的格式合同解释原则。"合理期待原则"的产生和存在有其历史背景和理论基础,传统合同救济办法不能对被保险人提供有效救济是其产生的直接动因,保险合同为射幸合同,其所具有的悬殊的对价特征是其产生的根源,在本质上是公平原则的必然要求和延伸,其法律价值目标是实现合同实质自由和公平正义。在我国保险法上应确立合理期待原则,但其适用要在满足传统合同救济方法不能提供有效救济这一前提下,受到严格限制。 The legal concept of "meeting the reasonable expectations of the insured" in the United States' Insur- ance Law,which has been gradually aecepted by many countries,has developed into a new format for the principles of contract interpretation. The emergence and existence of the Reasonable Expectation Principle has its historical background and theoretical foundation. The direct cause is that the traditional contract remedies cannot provide ef- fective relief to the insured. The feature of aleatory insurance contract with the gap between the considerations is the root cause. In essence, the Reasonable Expectation Principle is the inevitable requirement and extension of the fair- ness principle. Its legal objective is to achieve real freedom of contract and fairness and justice. The Reasonable Ex- pectation Principle should be established in China's Insurance Law, but the application of this principle should be subject to strict limitations, on the premise that the traditional contract remedies can not provide effective relief.
作者 李利 许崇苗
出处 《保险研究》 北大核心 2011年第4期104-109,共6页 Insurance Studies
关键词 保险法 格式合同 合同解释 合理期待原则 Insurance Law structured contract contract interpretation Reasonable Expectation Principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1樊启荣.美国保险法上“合理期待原则”评析[J].法商研究,2004,21(3):117-126. 被引量:54
  • 2(2010)渑民一初字第838号民事判决书.
  • 3刘宗荣.新保险法:保险契约的理论与实务[M].中国民大学出版社,2009.
  • 4Sangster's trus teev. General accident assurance corpltd, 189624pp. 56- 57.
  • 5Karl Llewellyn, The Effect Of Legal Institutions Upon Economies,American Economic Review, 1925,7. 15,p665- 673.
  • 6Keeton R. E. and Widiss A. 1. lnsuranee Law,p. 633.
  • 7Robert E Keeton. Insurance Law Rights at Variance with Policy Provisions,Harvard l,aw Review 1970,v. 83.
  • 8Mark C. Rahdert, Reasonable Expectations Revisited, Connecticut Insurance Law Jo,Jrnal, 1998, v. 5 ,. 109 - 110.
  • 9刘宗荣著.《新保险法:保险契约的理论与实务》第7页,中国人民大学出版社2009年1月第1版.

二级参考文献25

  • 1[美]约翰·亨利·梅利曼 顾培东 禄正平译.《大陆法系》[M].法律出版社,2004年版.第87页.第44页.
  • 2See Scott B. Krider, The Rtmastruxction of Insurance Contracts Under the Doctrine of Reascoable Expectations,18J. MARSHALL. REV. 155(1984).
  • 3Delancy v. Rockingham Farmers Mutual Insurance Co, 52 N.H. 581,587(1913).
  • 4Bowler v .Fidelity and Contyact and Choice of New York, 53 N.J.313,250 A. 2d 580 (1969).
  • 5Abranham, Freedom Contract and Coice of Law in Insurance, 93 Harvard Law Review 1981, p. 109.
  • 6Stephen J. Ware,A Critique of the Returnable Expectations Doctrine ,56 University of Chicago Law Review 1461,1463-1475(Fall 1989), p.267, p.296.
  • 7Mark C. Rahdert, Reasonable Expectations Reconsidered,18 Connecticut Law Review 323, 334 (1986).
  • 8Aiu ins co v fmc corp ,247 calrptr 820, 831 (1990).
  • 9Abrahams v. Medkerranean Ins & Reins Co Ltd (1991) 1 LIoyd's Rep,p. 114.
  • 10Youell v. Blard Wdch & Co Ltd(1992) 2 Loyd's Rep p. 127.

共引文献53

同被引文献162

引证文献10

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部