期刊文献+

时间管理习惯量表的初步修订及在大学生中的信效度研究

Initial revision of time management habit scale and its reliability and validity in college students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 初步修订时间管理习惯量表(time management habit scale,THDS),考察在大学生中使用的信度和效度.方法 对6所大学的1042名大学生施测时间管理习惯量表(TMH)和青少年时间管理倾向量表(ATMD),并将施测被试按单双编号随机分为两个部分.一个部分的测量数据进行探索性因素分析,以获得其结构;另一部分测量数据进行验证性因素分析,以检验量表的信度和效度.结果 TMH经项目分析与探索性因素分析后取目标设定、计划执行、时间控制3个维度更合适,3个维度解释总变异的49.577%;内部一致性α系数3个维度的范围在0.8324~0.8459之间,全量表的α系数为0.9076;重测信度为0.766(P<0.001),验证性因素分析表明3个维度模型优于四维度模型.结论 修订后的时间管理习惯量表其一致性信度、重测信度、内容效度和结构效度均达到心理测量学标准. Objective To revise the time management habit scale and examine its reliability and validity.Methods 1042 college students were assessed with time management habit scale (TMH) and time management disposition scale(ATMD). All students were randomly split into two samples with equal size. Exploratory factor analysis(EFA) was conducted to obtain the structure of TMH with one sample and then the stability of the new structure was examined by confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) with another sample. Results EFA extracted three factors that explained 49. 577% of the whole variance. CFA analysis that the three-factor model represented the data better than the four-factor model. The Cronbach' s alphas reliability was 0.9076. The three-factor was 0.8324~0.8459. The test-retest reliability was 0.766 (P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion The Cronbach' s alphas reliability, testretest reliability, content validity and construct validity of new TMH accord with psychometric demands.
作者 魏源
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期372-374,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
关键词 时间管理倾向 量表 信度 效度 Time management Scale Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献101

共引文献874

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部