3Ren X, Wang W, Chu T, et al. The intermediate clinical outcome and its limitations of Bryan cervical arthroplasty for treatment of cervical disc herniation[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech,2011, 24 (4): 221-229.
4Yonenobu K, Wada E, Tanaka T, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire(Part 2): endorsement of the alternative item[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2007, 12(3): 241-248.
5J'oyce CR, Zutshi DW, Hrubes V, et al. Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain[J]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 1975, 8(6): 415-420.
6Pechlivanis I, Brenke C, Scholz M, et al. Treatment of de- generative cervical disc disease with uncoforaminotomy-inter- mediate clinical outcome[J]. Minim Invasive Neurosurg, 2008, 51(4): 211-217.
7Borden AG, Rechtman AM, Gershon CJ. The normal cervical lordosis[J]. Radi01ogy, 1960 3(74): 806-809.
9Simpson AK, Biswas D, Emerson JW, et al. Quantifying the effects of age, gender, degeneration, and adjacent level de- generation on cervical spine range of motion using multivari- ate analyses[J]. Spine, 2008, 33(2): 183-186.
10Sasso RC, Best NM, Metcalf NH, et al. Motion analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicen- ter, clinical trial[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2008, 21(6): 393- 399.
