期刊文献+

单焦点及多焦点非球面IOL植入术后的高阶像差对比(英文)

Comparison of higher-order aberrations between implantations of AcrySof and AcrySof ReStor multifocal aspherical intraocular lens
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较不同瞳孔直径下单焦点AcrySofIQ(SN60WF)及多焦点非球面人工晶状体AcrySofReStor+3(SN6AD1)植入术后的高阶像差。方法:回顾性选取2009-08/2010-04在我院眼科行超声乳化吸出术联合人工晶状体植入术的患者54例62眼,按照植入人工晶状体的不同类型分为两组:AcrySofIQ组及AcrySofReStor组。主要观察项目为术后球差(C12)及总高阶像差的均方根(RMSh)。结果:两组术后3mo应用波前像差仪(AllegroAnalyzer)检查,瞳孔直径在5,6,7mm时,A组球差和B组球差和RMSh均方根均随着瞳孔直径增大而增加,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);瞳孔直径为5,6,7mm时,A组总高阶像差与B组相比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在瞳孔直径5,6,7mm的时候AcrySofIQ及AcrySofReStor的高阶像差基本无差别。 AIM:To compare the higher-order aberrations between implantations of AcrySof and AcrySof ReStor multifocal aspherical intraocular lens(IOL) with various pupil diameters.METHODS:Fifty-four patients(62 eyes)with bilateral senile cataracts were retrospectively selected.Patients were operated with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation.They were divided into two groups based on the IOL implantation of AcrySof IQ and AcrySof ReStor.Wave front aberration:spherical aberration(C12)and the root mean square of the total higher-order aberration(RMSh)were observed 3 months after surgery.RESULTS:The larger the pupil was, the higher the C12 and RMSh were in the eyes (P〈0.01).There were no statistical differences in C12 or RMSh between two groups at 5, 6 or 7mm pupil diameters (P〉0.05). CONCLUSION:There are no differences between AcrySof IQ group and AcrySof ReStor group at 5, 6 or 7mm pupil diameters.
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 2011年第4期570-572,共3页 International Eye Science
关键词 超声乳化 多焦点人工晶状体 波前像差 瞳孔直径 phacoemulsification multifocal intraocular lens wave-front aberration pupil diameters
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献54

  • 1毕宏生,马晓华,蔡宛亭,王兴荣,陈伟,刘冬梅,解孝锋.多焦点人工晶状体的临床应用研究[J].中华眼科杂志,2004,40(6):385-388. 被引量:14
  • 2黄蒂,施玉英.Acrysof ReSTOR多焦点人工晶状体临床应用的初步报告[J].眼科,2006,15(5):344-347. 被引量:22
  • 3Post CT Jr. Comparison of depth of focus and low-contrast acuities for monofocal versus multifocal intraocular lens patients at 1 year. Ophthalmology, 1992,99 : 1658-1663 ; discussion by DD Koch,1663-1664.
  • 4Weghaupt H, Pieh S, Skorpik C. Comparison of pseudoaccommodation and visual quality between a diffractive and refractive muhifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1998,24:663-665.
  • 5Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, et al. Correlation between papillary size and intraocular lens decentration and visual acuity of a zonal-progressive muhifocal lens and a monofocal lens. Ophthalmology, 2001,108:2011-2017.
  • 6Kohnen T, Allen D, Boureau C, et al. European Muhicenter Study of the AcrySof ReSTOR Apodized Diffractive Intraocular Lens. Ophthalmology, 2006,113:578-584.
  • 7Chiam PJ, Chan JH, Aggarwal RK, et al. ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: Quality of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006, 32:1459-1463.
  • 8Blaylock JF, Si Z, Vickers C. Visual and refractive status at different focal distances after implantation of the ReSTOR muhifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006, 32:1464-1473.
  • 9Weghaupt H, Pieh S, Skorpik C. Comparison of pseudoaccommodation and visual quality between a diffractive and refractive muhifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1998,24 : 663 -665.
  • 10Pieh S, Kellner C, Hanselmayer G, et al. Comparison of visual acuities at different distances and defocus curves. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002,28 : 1964-1967.

共引文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部