期刊文献+

度洛西汀和阿米替林对抑郁症患者生命质量的影响 被引量:3

A comparative study of efficacy on the quality of life between duloxetine and amitriptyline in treating patients with depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究度洛西汀和阿米替林对抑郁症患者生命质量的影响,以及生命质量和疗效及药物副作用的相关性。方法:将57例抑郁症患者随机分为度洛西汀组(研究组,30例)和阿米替林组(对照组,27例),疗程6周。在基线和1、2、4、6周后,给予评定健康状况问卷(SF-36)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)(24项版)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、治疗过程出现症状量表(TESS)。结果:治疗6周后,研究组和对照组有效率相近,分别为86.67%(26/30)、85.19%(23/27),P>0.05;痊愈率相近,分别为46.67%(14/30)、44.44%(12/27),P>0.05;对照组不良反应发生率高于研究组(77.78%vs36.67%,P<0.05);治疗6周后,研究组SF-36各因子分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。SF-36多项因子分的提高和HAMD减分率、HAMA减分率成正相关,和TESS总分成负相关(P<0.05)。结论:度洛西汀对抑郁症患者生命质量的改善优于阿米替林;抑郁症患者生命质量和焦虑、抑郁情绪的改善及药物治疗的副作用密切相关。 AIM : To study the efficacy on the quality of life between duloxetine and amitriptyline in treating patients with depression. METHODS : 57 patients were randomized to either duloxetine group(research group,n =30) or amitriptyline group(control group,n =27) for a 6-week period treatment.All patients were assessed with Short-Form-36 Health Survey(SF-36),Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD,24-items),Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA) and the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale(TESS) before treatment and at the ends of the 1st,2nd,4th and 6th week treatment. RESULTS :The response rates in duloxetine and amitriptyline group were 86.67 %(26/30)and 85.19 %(23/27)respectively at the sixth weekend,the remission rates were 46.67 %(14/30)and 44.44 %(12/27),which showed no statistical difference between the two groups(P 0.05).Incidences of adverse reactions in amitriptyline group was significantly higher than that in duloxetine group(77.78 % vs 36.67 %,P 0.05).At the sixth weekend,all the factor scores of SF-36 in duloxetine group were significantly higher than those in control group(P 0.05).The improvement of the most factor scores of SF-36 after 6-week treatment was positively correlated with the decrease rates of total score of HAMD and HAMA,and negatively correlated with the total score of TESS(P 0.05). CONCLUSION : Duloxetine is better than amitriptyline in the improvement of quality of life in depression patients.The quality of life in depression patients is closely correlated to their depression,anxiety symptom and treatment emergent side effects.
出处 《中国临床药理学与治疗学》 CAS CSCD 2011年第1期67-71,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
基金 2009广东省自然科学基金(9151008901000065)
关键词 抑郁症 生命质量 度洛西汀 阿米替林 Depression Quality of life Duloxetine Amitriptyline
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Strine TW, Kroenke K, Dhingra S, et al. The associations between depression, health-related quality of life, social support, life satisfaction, and disability in community-dwelling US adults [J]. J Nerv Ment Dis,2009,197(1) :61-64.
  • 2Kennedy SH, Eisfeld BS, Cooke RG. Quality of life: an important dimension in assessing the treatment of depression [J]? J Psychiatry Neurosci, 2001,26 Suppl:S23-28.
  • 3国效峰,赵靖平,陈晋东.度洛西汀:一种新型抗抑郁药[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2006,25(7):552-555. 被引量:89
  • 4中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准[M] 3版[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.31-6.
  • 5纪术茂,房明,吴斌,等.汉弥顿焦虑量表[M]//张作记,主编.行为医学量表手册.北京:中华医学电子音像出版社,2005:214-215.
  • 6纪术茂,高成阁,吴斌,等.汉弥顿抑郁量表[M]//张作记,主编.行为医学量表手册.北京:中华医学电子音像出版社,2005:225-227.
  • 7沈鑫华,钱敏才,林敏,费小聪,王士良.度洛西汀和舍曲林治疗抑郁症的对照研究[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2009,14(2):207-209. 被引量:9
  • 8马元业,任俊赏,王润泽.度洛西汀与阿米替林治疗首发抑郁症的比较分析[J].四川精神卫生,2009,22(4):233-235. 被引量:4
  • 9Mathur A, Sharma DK, Choudhary A, et al. Efficacy and safety of citalopram versus amitriptyline in the treatment of major depression [J]. Indian J Psy chiatry,2005 ,47(2) :89-93.
  • 10骆艳丽,吴文源,李春波,李清伟,张明园.持续性躯体形式疼痛障碍生命质量的相关因素研究[J].上海精神医学,2007,19(1):19-22. 被引量:17

二级参考文献53

  • 1温新民,毛庆华,汤建,虞心红.度洛西汀的合成进展[J].合成化学,2004,12(6):551-554. 被引量:11
  • 2Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, et al. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication [ J]. Arch Gen Psychiatry,, 2005,62(6) :617 - 627.
  • 3Rush A J, Fava M, Wisniewski SR, et al. Sequenced treatment ahematives to relieve depression (STAR * D): rationale and design [ J ]. Control Clin Trials, 2004, 25 (1):119- 142.
  • 4Detke M J, Lu Y, Goldstein D J, et al. Duloxetine 60 mg once daily dosing versus placebo in the acute treatment of major depression[J]. J Psychiatr Res, 2002,36(6) : 383 - 390.
  • 5Detke M J, Lu Y, Goldstein D J, et al. Duloxetine, 60 mg once daily, for major depressive disorder: a randomized double-blind plaeebo-eontrolled trial [ J]. J Clin Psychiatry, 2002,63(4) :308 - 315.
  • 6Goldstein DJ, Mallinckrodt C, Lu Y, et al. Duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a double-blind clinical trial[J]. J Clin Psychiatry, 2002,63(3) :225 - 231.
  • 7Lee P, Shu L, Xu X, et al. Once-daily duloxetine 60 mg in the treatment of major depressive disorder: multicenter, double-blind, randomized, paroxetine-controlled, non-inferiority trial in China, Korea, Taiwan and Brazil [ J].Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 2007,61 (3) : 295 - 307.
  • 8Perahib DG, Pritchett YL, Kajdasz DK, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of duloxetine and venlafaxine in the treatment of patients with major depressive disor- der[ J ]. J Psychiatr Res, 2008,42 ( 1 ) : 22 - 34.
  • 9Mallinckrodt CH, Parkash A, Houston JP, et al. Differential antidepressant symptom efficacy: placebo-controlled comparisons of duloxetine and SSRIs ( fluoxetine, paroxefine, escitalopram) [J]. Neuropsychobioiogy, 2007,56(2/ 3) :73 - 85.
  • 10Klan A, Bose A, Mexopoulos GS, et al. Double-blind comparison of escitalopram and duloxetine in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder[J]. Clin Drug Investig, 2007,27(7) :481 - 492.

共引文献236

同被引文献36

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部