期刊文献+

四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩与美国Fort Worth盆地石炭系Barnett组页岩地质特征对比 被引量:123

Comparison of Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale of Sichuan Basin in China and Carboniferous Barnett Formation shale of Fort Worth Basin in United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从沉积学、地球化学、生烃演化、构造演化等方面,对美国Fort Worth盆地石炭系Barnett页岩和四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组页岩进行了对比性研究,发现四川盆地志留系,特别是川南志留系页岩气具有较好的勘探前景。2套烃源岩共性与个性共存,具有相似的沉积背景、厚度、有机质类型(Ⅰ~Ⅱ1)和生烃演化史。但是,Barnett页岩TOC值较高(3%~13%)、相对富集脆性矿物、页岩的微孔隙发育;龙马溪组页岩埋藏较深(一般2000-4000m)、相对富集粘土矿物,且具有较高的成熟度(普遍R0〉2%)、较大的隆升幅度和较快的隆升速率(3000m/80Ma)。 Based on the characteristics of sedimentation, geochemistry, structure evolution and hydrocarbon generation, we compared Carboniferous Barnett Formation shale(BFS) in Forth Worth Basin(United States)with Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale(LFS) in Sichuan Basin(China).There are good shale gas exploring prospects of LFS in Sichuan basin, especially in southern parts. Two sets of source rocks are the similar depositional environments, thickness, korogen types ( Ⅰ~Ⅱ1)and hydrocarbon generation processes. But Barnett shale are much richer TOC content (3-13%), brittle minerals and micropores more development; Longmaxi Formation shale are relatively deeper burial depth (commonly 2000-4000m) ,richer clay mineral content, higher thermal maturity (generally Ro〉2%), larger amplitude uplift and quick rising rates (3000m/80Ma).
出处 《地质通报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期372-384,共13页 Geological Bulletin of China
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划"973"项目<中国海相碳酸盐层系深层油气成藏机理>(编号:2005CB422106) 中国石化海相前瞻性项目<华南古板块地裂运动与海相油气前景>(编号:PH08001)
关键词 四川盆地 FORT worth盆地 Barnett页岩 志留系 龙马溪组 页岩气 Sichuan Basin Fort worth Basin Barnett shale Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale gas
  • 相关文献

参考文献51

  • 1Thompson D M. Fort Worth Basin [C]//Sloss L L. The geology of North America Geological Societ'v of America, 1988,D-2:346-352.
  • 2Arbenz J K. The Ouachita system[C]//Bally A W, Palmer A R. The geology of North America-An overview Geological Society of America,1989, A:371-396.
  • 3Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer[M]. Tulsa :U.S. Dep. of Ener. Office of Fos. Ener. and Nat. Ener. Tech. Lab.,2009.
  • 4Polhstro R M, Jarvie D M, Hill I~ J,et al. Adams Geologic frame- work of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Barnett-Paleozoic total petroleum system, Bend arch-Fort Worth Basin, Texas[J].AAPG Bul-letin,2007, 91(4):405-436.
  • 5Curtis J B. Fractured shale-gas systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86 (11): 1921-1938.
  • 6Montgomery S L , Jarvie D M , Bowker K A, et al. Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, northcentral Texas: Gas-shale play with multi-trillion cubic foot potential[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2005,89(2): 155-175.
  • 7王世谦,陈更生,董大忠,杨光,吕宗刚,徐云浩,黄永斌.四川盆地下古生界页岩气藏形成条件与勘探前景[J].天然气工业,2009,29(5):51-58. 被引量:167
  • 8刘树根,曾祥亮,黄文明,马文辛.四川盆地页岩气藏和连续型-非连续型气藏基本特征[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2009,36(6):578-592. 被引量:80
  • 9Walper J L. Paleozoic tectonics of the southern margin of North America[C]//Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transac- dons 1977,27:230-239.
  • 10Walper J L. Plate tectonic evolution of the Fort Worth Basin[C]// Martin C A. Petroleum geology of the Fort Worth Basin and Bend arch area Dallas Geological Society,1982:237-251.

二级参考文献320

共引文献2389

同被引文献1659

引证文献123

二级引证文献1978

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部