期刊文献+

消化道重建术后肠道细菌移位的临床研究(英文) 被引量:5

Clinical study on bacterial translocation in patients after digestive tract reconstruction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨消化道重建术后肠黏膜屏障损伤与肠道细菌移位(BT)及BT与术后全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)的关系。方法:选择60例择期行消化道重建术的患者,于术前和术后1、3、5 d采集外周血,进行血浆二胺氧化酶及全血细菌DNA检测。全血DNA提取后进行PCR扩增,采用的靶基因为大肠杆菌特异性β半乳糖苷酶基因和16SrRNA基因。观察患者至术后10 d以监测SIRS情况。结果:术前PCR检测全血细菌DNA均为阴性,术后共有14例阳性。23例患者术后发生SIRS,其中12例患者PCR阳性。PCR阳性组SIRS发生率为85.7%(12/14),阴性组为23.9%(11/46)(P<0.01)。术后出现SIRS的患者PCR阳性率为52.2%(12/23),无SIRS组为5.4%(2/37)(P<0.01)。PCR阳性的患者血浆二胺氧化酶浓度较PCR阴性者明显升高(P<0.01),有SIRS的患者血浆二胺氧化酶较无SIRS患者明显升高(P<0.01)。结论:消化道重建术后BT与肠黏膜屏障损伤密切相关,术后SIRS与BT密切相关。PCR技术可早期诊断细菌移位,对术后SIRS有较好的早期预警价值。 Objective:To investigate gut barrier dysfunction and bacterial translocation(BT) in patients who underwent digestive tract reconstruction and to study the relationship between BT and acute systemic inflammatory state(SIRS).Methods: Sixty patients who underwent selective digestive tract reconstruction were observed.Blood were collected before surgery and 1,3,5 days after surgery to detect plasma diamine oxidase(DAO) and bacterial DNA.PCR analysis was performed with β-Galactosidase gene of Eschenchia coli and 16SrRNA gene as target gene.The SIRS of all the patients were observed for 10 days.Results: All the PCR results before operation were negative,while there was positive in 14 patients after digestive tract reconstruction.There were 23 patients with SIRS after surgery,and 12 patients PCR result were positive among 23 patients with SIRS.85.7% of the patients(12/14) with positive PCR result had SIRS,while 23.9% patients(11/46) with negative PCR result had SIRS(P〈0.01).The positive PCR rate in SIRS was 52.2%(12/23),which was remarkably higher than that without SIRS(5.4%,2/37,P〈0.01).The levels of plasma DAO in patients with positive PCR result was significantly higher than those of the patients with negative PCR result(P〈0.01).The levels of plasma DAO in patients with SIRS was significantly higher than those of patients without SIRS(P〈0.01).Conclusion:The gut barrier dysfunction was closely related to BT,and BT was closely related to postoperative SIRS.PCR analysis can be used in early diagnosis of BT,the positive PCR result might be a useful early warning sign of postoperative SIRS.
出处 《中国现代普通外科进展》 CAS 2011年第2期133-136,共4页 Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery
基金 黎介寿院士肠道屏障研究专项基金(LJS_201013)
关键词 肠黏膜屏障损伤 细菌移位 二胺氧化酶 PCR 全身炎症反应综合征 Gut barrier dysfunction·Bacterial translocation·Diamine oxidase·PCR·SIRS
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献33

  • 1黎君友,于燕,郝军,晋桦,许惠君.分光光度法测定血和小肠组织二胺氧化酶活性[J].氨基酸和生物资源,1996,18(4):28-30. 被引量:202
  • 2马利 肖光夏 黎鳌 等.内毒素与肠源性感染[J].第二军医大学学报,1990,12:21-23.
  • 3Leaphart CL, Tepas JJ. The gut is a motor of organ system dysfunction. Surgery, 2007,141 : 563-569.
  • 4Marshall JC. Sepsis : rethinking the approach to clinical research. J Leukoc Biol, 2008,83:471-482.
  • 5Adams CA Jr, Xu DZ, Lu Q, et al. Factors larger than 100 kd in post-hemorrhagic shock mesenteric lymph are toxic for endothelial cells. Surgery, 2001,129 : 351-363.
  • 6Cavriani G, Domingos HV, Soares AL, et al. Lymphatic system as a path underlying the spread of lung and gut injury after intestinal ischemia reperfusion in rats. Shock, 2005,23: 330-336.
  • 7Gabriela C, Helori VD, Alexandre LS, et al. Lymphatic system as a path underlying the spread of lung and gut injury after intestinal ischemia/reperfusion in rats. Shock, 2005,23 : 330-336.
  • 8Stallion A, Kou TD, Latifi SQ, et al. Ischemia/reperfusion : a clinically relevant model of intestinal injury yielding systemic inflammation. J Pediatr Surg, 2005,40 : 470-477.
  • 9Ito K, Ozasa H, Kojima N, et al. Pharmacological preconditioning protects lung injury induced by intestinal ischemia/reperfusion in rat. Shock, 2003,19:462-468.
  • 10Danielle GS, Rodrigo G, Vanessa P, et al. IL-1-Driven endogenous IL-10 production protects against the systemic and local acute inflammatory response following intestinal reperfusion injury. J Immunol, 2003,170:4759-4766.

共引文献50

同被引文献56

  • 1肖菲,康焰.肠道细菌移位的研究现状[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2006,13(2):240-243. 被引量:21
  • 2张志明,张才全.不同类型肠梗阻内毒素移位时段变化的实验研究[J].中国普通外科杂志,2007,16(4):389-390. 被引量:9
  • 3Steinberg SM. Bacterial translocation : what it is and what it is not. Am J Surg,2003,186 (3) :301-305.
  • 4Zanoni FL, Benabou S, Greco KV, et al. Mesenteric microcircula- tory dysfunctions and translocation of indigenous bacteria in a rat model of strangulated small bowel obstruction. Clinics( Sao Paulo), 2009,64(9) :911-919.
  • 5Teshima CW, Meddings JB. The measurement and clinical signifi- cance of intestinal permeability. Curr Gastroenterol Rep,2008,10 (5) :443-449.
  • 6乔治,李荣,黎沾良,李基业,陆连荣.胃肠外科术后肠道细菌移位的临床研究[J].解放军医学杂志,2007,32(10):1072-1074. 被引量:9
  • 7Sunpaweravong S, Ruangsin S, Laohawiriyakamol S, et al. Pre- diction of major postoperative complications and survival for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma patients[ J]. Asian J Surg,2012, 35(3) :104-109.
  • 8Rice TW, Blaekstone EH, Rusch VW. 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: esophagus and esophagogastrie junction [J]. Ann Surg 0neol,2010,17(7) :1721-1724.
  • 9Ferguson MK, Celauro AD, Prachand V. Prediction of major pul- monary complications after esophagectomy [ J ]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2011,91 (5) : 1494-1500.
  • 10Oshima K, Kunimoto F, Hinohara H, et al. Evaluation of respiratory status in patients after thoracic esophagectomy using PiCCO system [ J]. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2008,14( 5 ) :283-288.

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部