期刊文献+

焚烧炉渣集料用于道路铺筑的节能减排定量 被引量:17

Energy Saving and Pollution Alleviation by Replacement of Crushed Rock with Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Bottom Ash for Road Construction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以上海浦东国际机场北通道工程的17标K11+203~K11+413试验段为例,在资源、能源消耗以及环境排放方面,从生命周期分析的角度对用垃圾焚烧(MSWI)炉渣替代部分碎石集料铺路和用纯碎石铺路这两种工艺进行了分析比较.结果表明,利用垃圾焚烧炉渣替代碎石铺路可以节约53.9%的石料资源,同时降低约47%的能耗;与能源和资源节约相对应,上述工艺的各种大气污染物以及有机污染物如化学需氧量(COD)、总氮、苯酚类物质等的生命周期排放都较纯碎石集料工艺低42%~50%.但在没有控制措施的条件下以焚烧炉渣替代碎石集料铺路会导致Cd,Cr,Cu,Ni,Pb,Zn等重金属浸出量有一定增加,砷的浸出量降低. The construction project of section No.17th K11 + 203~K11 + 413,north highway to Shanghai Pudong international airport,where municipal solid waste incineration(MSWI) bottom ash was used as aggregate to replace part of crushed natural rock,was taken as an example for energy saving and pollution alleviation analysis.Life cycle assessment(LCA) was performed for this replacement to evaluate the differences in energy consumption and emissions.The results show that 53.9%of natural rock resource can be saved by using MSWI bottom ash as part of aggregate in road base construction;the energy consumption can be reduced by around 47%compared with road construction with all aggregate materials coming from graded crushed rock.Also the emissions to air and discharge of COD,N-total,oil,and phenol to ground water that are related to energy production consumption are reduced by 42%to 50%.However,recycling MSWI bottom ash as part of aggregate in road construction could lead to an increase in leaching heavy metals of Cd,Cr,Cu,Ni,Pb and Zn,while the leaching of arsenic is reduced.
出处 《建筑材料学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期71-77,共7页 Journal of Building Materials
基金 上海市科委节能减排专项基金资助项目(08DZ1204000)
关键词 垃圾焚烧(MSWI)炉渣 碎石 生命周期分析(LCA) 能耗 排放 municipal solid waste incineration(MSWI) bottom ash crushed rock life cycle assessment(LCA) energy consumption emissions
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1ROGBECK J,HARTLEN J. Ash gravel A material for recycling[J]. Waste Management, 1996,16(1-3) : 109-112.
  • 2van Der SLOOT H A,KOSSON D S, HJELMAR O. Characteristics,treatment and utilization of residues from municipal waste incineration [J]. Waste Management, 2001, 21 ( 8 ) : 753-765.
  • 3徐祖信.上海环境年鉴--2004[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2004:160.
  • 4何品晶,宋立群,章骅,石爱娟,张沛君.垃圾焚烧炉渣的性质及其利用前景[J].中国环境科学,2003,23(4):395-398. 被引量:60
  • 5宋立杰.城市垃圾焚烧炉渣的稳定化处理研究[D].上海:同济大学,2001.
  • 6李玉华,焦宝祥,包冬雷,顾新华.垃圾焚烧后的无机渣作水泥混合材料的研究[J].环境污染与防治,2004,26(2):119-120. 被引量:1
  • 7OLSSON S, KARRMAN E, GUSTAFSSON J P. Environmental systems analysis of the use of bottom ash from incineration of municipal waste for road construction[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2006 (48) : 26-40.
  • 8BIRGISDOTTIR H, PIHL K A, BHANDER G, et al. Environmental assessment of roads constructed with and withoutbottom ash from municipal solid waste incineration[J]. Transportation Research (part D) ,2006(11):358-368.
  • 9杨建新,王如松.生命周期评价的回顾与展望[J].环境科学进展,1998,6(2):21-28. 被引量:93
  • 10赵由才,宋立杰.垃圾焚烧厂焚烧底灰的处理研究[J].环境污染与防治,2003,25(2):95-97. 被引量:22

二级参考文献15

  • 1钟白茜,钱同生,施书哲.粉煤灰作为高性能水泥材料可能性探讨[J].粉煤灰,1998,10(6):8-11. 被引量:1
  • 2蒲心诚,杨长辉,何桂,赵廷仕.大掺量粉煤灰水泥研究[J].房材与应用,1996,24(3):4-8. 被引量:8
  • 3中华人民共和国交通部.公路路面基层施工技术规范(JTJ034-2000)[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2002.1-71.
  • 4.GB 7871-87.森林土壤水溶性盐分分析[s].,..
  • 5.GB5085.3-1996.危险废物鉴别标准——浸出毒性鉴别[s].,..
  • 6Chandler A J, Eighmy T T, Hartlen J, et al. Municipal solid waste incinerator residues [M]. The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B. V.,1997.203-254, 454-472.
  • 7Chimenos J M, Segarra M, Fermandez M A, et al. Characterization of the bottom ash in municipal solid waste incinerator [J].Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1999,64(3):211-222.
  • 8Tay Joo-Hwa, Goh Anthony T C. Engineering properties of incinerator residue [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering,1991,117(2):224-235.
  • 9Kosson D S, Kosson T T, van der Sloot H A. Evaluation of solidification/stabilization treatment processes for municipal waste combustion residues (Project summary) [R]. Wastington DC: USEPA, 1993,1-8.
  • 10欧阳志云,中国生态学会通讯,1997年,51卷,2期,10页

共引文献168

同被引文献200

引证文献17

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部