期刊文献+

电磁法在深部找矿中的应用现状及展望 被引量:40

Application status and vistas of electromagnetic methods to deep ore prospecting
下载PDF
导出
摘要 地球物理勘探方法 (尤其是电磁法)在发现金属矿产资源中取得了很大的成功.一般认为离地表500米以内的金属矿床已基本上被发现和勘探利用,并且正在迅速枯竭.由于在新的采矿区安装新的采矿设施非常昂贵,因此当前面临的挑战是在老矿区内及其周围寻找适合开采的深部矿体(0.5km~2km).寻找深部矿体需要大尺度的地球物理方法支撑,本文用有限篇幅介绍了电磁法在深部找矿中的应用现状、电磁法数据处理和解释研究进展及仪器设备研制进展,以典型案例说明了它们在深部找矿中的应用效果,对电磁法技术在深部找矿中的应用前景作出了展望. Geophysical methods (particularly electromagnetic methods) have been very successfully used to discover economic base metal and precious metal ore resources. A common view is that all mineral deposits within 500 m of the surface, and close to existing infrastructure, have essentially been discovered and exploited, and are rapidly being depleted. Because of the high cost of installing new infrastructure in green field areas, the modern challenge is to determine if there are deeper deposits at economically recoverable depths (typically 0.5 to 2 km) within or close to existing deposits and infrastructure. Discovering deep ore needs large scale geophysical methodsr supporting. Application status of electromagnetic methods (EM) to deep ore prospecting, study progress of EM data process and interpretations and EM instruments are introduced in the paper. Some examples are given to show application efficiency of EM techniques to deep ore prospecting. Some promising aspects of the applications of EM techniques to deep ore prospecting are presented.
出处 《地球物理学进展》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期327-334,共8页 Progress in Geophysics
基金 中国地质调查局地质大调查项目(2009-01-14-01) 国家重大科技专项(SinoProbe-03-04)资助
关键词 电磁法 深部矿 勘查 展望 electromagnetic method, deep ore, prospecting, vistas
  • 相关文献

参考文献61

  • 1刘宝瑁.资源环境的科学发展观[0L].http://www.casad.cas.cn/yslt/200509/t200509z1-43753.html,2005.
  • 2周平,施俊法.瞬变电磁法(TEM)新进展及其在寻找深部隐伏矿中的应用[J].地质与勘探,2007,43(6):63-69. 被引量:46
  • 3赵国泽,陈小斌,汤吉.中国地球电磁法新进展和发展趋势[J].地球物理学进展,2007,22(4):1171-1180. 被引量:123
  • 4King A. Deep drill hole electromagnetic surveys for nickel/ copper sulphides at Sudbury, Canada [ J ]. Exploration Geophysics, 1996, 27: 105-118.
  • 5Stevens K M, McNeice G. On The detection of Ni-Cu ore hosting structures in the Sudbury igneous complex using the magnetotelluric method[J]. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 1998.
  • 6Grant N, Rodney K. A progressive geophysical exploration strategy at the Shea Creek uranium deposit[J]. The Leading Edge, 2008, 52-63.
  • 7Mark G. A comparison between conventional and distributed acquisition induced polarization surveys for gold exploration in Nevada[J]. The Leading Edge, 2007, 180-183.
  • 8Andrews R K. The Sol sulfide system, Graham County, Arizona: Report on VIP work[J]. Kennecott Exploration,- 1975.
  • 9Gasperikova E, Cuevas N H, Morrison H F. Natural field induced polarization for mapping of deep mineral deposits: Afield example from Arizona[J]. Geophysics, 2005, 70 (6) : 61-66.
  • 10Eso R, Oldenburg D. 3D forward modeling and inversion of CSEM data at the San Nicolds massive sulphide deposit[J]. 4th International Symposium on Three-Dimensional Electmmagnetics, 2007, 185-188.

二级参考文献534

共引文献997

同被引文献662

引证文献40

二级引证文献341

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部