期刊文献+

麻风受累者活动受限及安全认知的评估 被引量:1

Assessment activity limitation and safety awareness in people affected by leprosy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价麻风受累者对活动受限和预防残疾的安全认知。方法:采用行动受限和安全认知筛查量表(SALSA)对125例麻风受累者进行问卷调查。结果:125例麻风受累者眼手足畸残分数(EHF score)平均为5.1,平均SALSA分数为29.8。当EHF分数小于5时,SALSA平均分数少于30;EHF分数等于或大于5时,SALSA平均分数为39.23。受累者EHF分数与SALSA分数呈正相关(P<0.001)。本组绝大多数麻风受累者几乎没有建立安全认知。结论:SALSA分数越高麻风受累者活动越受到限制。SALSA筛查问卷可用于现场对麻风受累者进行活动受限和安全认知进行初步评估。 Objective: To assess the activity limitation and the safety awareness for preventing disability in people affected by leprosy. Methods: The activity limitation and the safety awareness in 125 people affected by leprosy were surveyed with the questionnaire Screening of Activity Limitation & Safety Awareness (SALSA). Results: The average eye, hand & foot score (EHF score) was 5.1. The SALSA score varied from 11 to 77 with a mean of 29.8. When EHF score was below 5, the average SALSA score lower than 30; when EHF score was equalor higher than 5, the average SALSA score 39.2, the EHF score was positively correlated with SALSA score ( P 〈 0.01). Vast majority of these people affected by leprosy did not have the knowledge on safety awareness. Conclusion: Higher SALSA scores reflect increase in activity limitation. SALSA questionnaire can be used to screen and assess the activity limitation and the safety awareness for people affected by leprosy.
出处 《中国麻风皮肤病杂志》 2011年第3期157-160,共4页 China Journal of Leprosy and Skin Diseases
基金 贵州省疾病预防控制中心科技基金课题(项目号:2007-24)
关键词 麻风 活动 受限 认知 评估 残疾 leprosy activity limitation awareness assessment disability
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Srinivasan H. Disability and rehabilitation in leprosy: issues and challenges. Ind J Lepr 2000;72:317 - 337.
  • 2World Health Organization. The Final Push Towards Elimination of Leprosy: Strategic Plan (2000- 2005). WHO/CDS/CPE/2001. 1 Geneva, 2000.
  • 3THE SALSA Collaborative study group. The development of a short questionnaire for screening of activity limitation and safety awareness (SALSA) in clients affected by leprosy or diabetes. Disabil and Re- habil 2007 ;29(9) :689 - 700.
  • 4Velema JP. Application of the SALSA scale for screening of activitylimitation and safety awareness, Presented International Leprosy Congress, Hyderabad, February 2008 (SPL- 32).
  • 5SALSA Beta Testing Package. www. ilep. org. uk/fileadmin/upoads/ Documents/Infolep- Documents /Salsa/Beta-Testing-Package-V1.0- S. pdf. London: KEP, 2004.
  • 6Expert Committee on leprosy. Sixth Report. 768. Technical Report Series. Geneva: WHO, 1988.
  • 7Ebenso J, Velema JP. Test - Retest reliability of the screening ac- tivity limitation and Safety Awareness (SALSA) scale in north- West Nigeria. Lepr Rev 2009;80:197 - 204.
  • 8Van Brakel WH, Reed NK, Reed DS. Grading impairment in lep- rosy. Lepr Rev 1999;70(2) :180- 188.
  • 9International Classification of Ftmctioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO, 2001.
  • 10Walker SL, Lockwood DN. Leprosy Type 1 (reversal) reactions and their management. Lepr Rev 2008;79(4) :372- 386.

二级参考文献2

共引文献7

同被引文献35

  • 1张国成,严良斌,沈建平.全国消除麻风病危害规划实施工作指南[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,2013:61-64.
  • 2Pannikar V. Enhanced global strategy for further reducing the disease burden due to leprosy :2011-2015 [ J ]. Lepr Rev,2009,80 (4) : 353-354.
  • 3World Health Organization. WHO Expert Committee on Leprosy [ J ]. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser,2012(968) :1-61.
  • 4Molyneux DH, Malecela MN. Neglected tropical diseases and the mil- lennium development goals :why the" other diseases" matter: reality ver- sus rhetoric [ J 1. Parasit Vectors,2011 (4) :234.
  • 5International Leprosy Summit. Overcoming Remaining Challenges, BANGKOK DECLARATION : TOWARDS A LEPROSY-FREE WORLD [ Z ]. Bangkok, Thailand,2013 : 1-4.
  • 6Alberts C J, Smith WC, Meima A, et al. Potential effect of the World Health Organization' s 2011-2015 global leprosy strategy on the prev- alence of grade 2 disability: a trend analysis [ J ]. Bull World Health Organ, 2011,89 ( 7 ) :487-495.
  • 7Nardi SM, Paschoal Vdel A, Chiaravalloti-Neto F, et al. Leprosy-related disabilities after release from multidrug treatment:prevalence and spa- tial distribution [ J ]. Rev Saude Publiea,2012,46 ( 6 ) :969 -977.
  • 8Mori S, Suzuki K, Barua S, et al. Future strategies for global leprosy control,2011-2015 [ J]. Nihon Hansenbyo Gakkai Zasshi, 2010,79 (1) :53-73.
  • 9Raposo MT, Caminha AV, Heukelbaeh J, et al. Assessment of physical impairments in leprosy patients:a comparison between the world health organization(who) disability grade and the Eye-Hand-Foot score [ J ]. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo,2011,53(2) :77-81.
  • 10Alford VM, Remedios LJ, Webb GR, et al. The use of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in indigenous healthcare:a systematic literature review [ J ]. Int J Equity Health, 2013,12(16) :32.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部