期刊文献+

磁共振灌注加权成像鉴别良恶性淋巴结的实验研究 被引量:3

Experimental study of MR perfusion-weighted imaging in differentiating the benign from metastatic lymph node in rabbits
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨T2*WI灌注成像鉴别良、恶性淋巴结的价值。方法 20只健康新西兰白兔随机分为两组,分别建立淋巴结炎(良性组)和淋巴结转移(VX2组)模型。由两位放射科医师分别独立勾绘感兴趣区,获得淋巴结灌注的时间信号曲线,并计算灌注参数:达峰值时间、最大强化速率及峰值增强率。结果 VX2组淋巴结的最小径明显较良性组大(P<0.01)。VX2组9只(90%)及良性组8只(80%)的淋巴结灌注的时间信号曲线均为"速升速降"型。两位观察者所测参数可重复性较高(γ>0.800)。两组淋巴结灌注参数之间均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论在时间信号曲线基础上的半定量灌注参数可判断良恶性淋巴结。 Objective To explore the differences of perfusion parameters with perfusion-weighted imaging(T2*WI) between metastatic and benign lymph nodes.Methods Twenty Newzeland rabbits were divided randomly into two groups of the benign inflammatory lymph node model(group C) and malignant lymph node metastatic model(group VX2).Two readers drawn the interest region and make the time-intensity curve(TIC),respectively.The time to reach the peak(TTP),the maximal slope descending(MSD%) and the peak heighted(PH%) were calculated.Results Lymph nodes of group VX2 were bigger than those of group C (P0.01).The same shape of TIC,including obvious steep down slope,upslope and a long plateau,was shown in 9 cases(90%) in group VX2 and in 8 cases(80%) in group C.The results from two readers were very similar(γ0.800).The differences of TTP,MSD% and PH% were significant between two groups(P0.05).Conclusion Based on the TIC,the semi-parameters can differentiate the benign inflammatory lymph node from malignant metastatic lymph node.
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第7期758-761,共4页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
基金 江苏省卫生厅科技计划资助项目(H200647) 上海市科委2008年国际科技合作基金项目(08210707600)
关键词 淋巴结 灌注加权成像 Lymph node Perfusion-weighted imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Clement O, Luciani A. Imaging the lymphatic system: possi- bilities and clinical applications[J]. Eur Radiol, 2004,14 (8) : 1498-1507.
  • 2Liu Y,Bellomi M,Gatti G,et al. Accuracy of computed tomography perfusion in assessing metastatic involvement of enlarged axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer [J]. Breast Cancer Res, 2007,9 (4) : R40.
  • 3Yankeelov TE,Gore JC. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oneology: theory, data acquisition, linaly sis,and examples[J]. Curr Med Imaging Rev, 2009, 3 (2): 91-107.
  • 4张学琴,顾红梅,李敏,汤乐民.3.0T磁共振灌注加权成像在脑胶质瘤的诊断价值[J].江苏医药,2010,36(2):177-179. 被引量:6
  • 5Paulson ES, Schmainda KM. Comparison of dynamic susceptibility weighted contrast-enhanced MR methods: recommendations for measuring relative cerebral blood volume in brain tumors[J]. Radiology, 2008,249 (2): 601-613.
  • 6Torts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T (1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1999,10(3) :223-232.
  • 7生晶,田建明,毕永明,张火俊,王敏杰,萧毅.CT灌注成像对颈部淋巴结病变的鉴别诊断和疗效评价[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(6):856-858. 被引量:9
  • 8Jackson A. Analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI[J]. Br J Radiol, 2004,77(2) : 154-166.
  • 9邢伟,陈杰,田建明.淋巴结病变影像学诊断进展[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2009,32(2):112-115. 被引量:6
  • 10Fischbein NJ, Noworolski SM, Henry RG, et al. Assessment of metastatic cervical adenopathy using dynamic contrastenhanced MR imaging[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2003,24 (3) :301-311.

二级参考文献20

  • 1张皓,沈天真,陈星荣,缪竞陶.DSC MR灌注成像在胶质瘤术前分级中的价值初探[J].中国医学影像技术,2004,20(8):1193-1196. 被引量:11
  • 2Lyshehik A Higashi T Asato R 王延安.声弹性成像诊断淋巴结转移癌的初步经验[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2007,5(3):224-224. 被引量:55
  • 3Cha S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, et al. lntracranial mass lesions: Dynamic contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted echo-planar perfusion MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 2002. 223 (1):11-29.
  • 4Scott JN,Brasher PM,Seviek RJ,et al. How often are nonenhancing supratentorial gliomas malignant? A population study [J]. Neurology,2002,59(6) :947-949.
  • 5Maia AC, Malheiros SM, da Rocha AJ, et al. MR cerebral blood volume maps correlated with vascular endothelial growth factor expression and tumor grade in nonenhancing gliomas [J]. AJNR, 2005,26(4):777-783.
  • 6Hakyemez B, Erdogan C, Ercan I, et al. High-grade and low grade gliomas: differentiation by using perfusion MR imaging[ J]. Clin Radiol, 2005,60(4) :493-502.
  • 7Lupo JM, Cha S, Chang SM, et al. Dynamic susceptibilityweighted imaging perfusion of high-grade gliomas: characterization of spatial heterogeneity [J]. AJNR,2005,26(6):1446- 1454.
  • 8Calli C,Kitis O, Yunten N, et al. Perfusion and diffusion MR imaging in enhancing malignant cerebral tumors [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2006,58(3) : 394-403.
  • 9Law M,Cha S, Knopp EA,et al. High-grade gliomas and solitary-metastases:differentiation by using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 2002,222 ( 3 ) : 715- 721.
  • 10Miles KA. Measurement of tissue perfusion by dynamic computed tomography[J]. Br J Radiol, 1991,64(761):409-412.

共引文献18

同被引文献44

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部