期刊文献+

“法不责众”的两面性探析 被引量:4

Discussion of "Law is not responsible for the masses"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国自古以来就有"法不责众"之说,随着人类文明的发展,"法不责众"的内涵也发生了变化。"法不责众"在适法(或执法)过程中不具有合法性,在立法过程中"法不责众"作为一种潜在的立法原则具有合法性。 China since ancient times have " Law is not responsible for the masses" say.With the development of human civilization," Law is not responsible for the masses" from ideas gradually moving towards a reality.Whether " Law is not responsible for the masses" can be equated with " Failure to be abide by"? The author will talk about the reasonableness and legality problem of Law is not responsible for the masses phenomenon from two aspects of Justice(or Law enforcement) and legislation.
作者 盛舒弘
出处 《广东广播电视大学学报》 2011年第2期87-89,共3页 Journal of Guangdong Radio & Television University
关键词 法不责众 法治 法律信仰 立法 Law is not responsible for the masses The rule of law Faith in Law legislation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1解照辉.“法不责众”思维源于公众麻木[EB/OL].http://news.163.com/09/0508/04/58P1HEB7000120GR.html.2009-05-08/2011-01-30.
  • 2刘以宾.两个90%“违法率”及“法不责众”[EB/OL].http://news.qq.com/a/20060610/000005.htm,2010-11-13/2011-1-31.
  • 3E.博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999:233-242.

同被引文献23

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部