期刊文献+

尾矿库排水系统两种水力计算方法的比较 被引量:2

Comparison of Two Hydraulic Calculation Methods for Drainage System of Tailings Pond
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据某尾矿库框架式排水井+排洪隧洞的排水系统,利用经验公式法和计算流体动力学流场模拟法(CFD)两种水力计算方法进行对比计算,CFD法计算得出的半压力流态下的泄流量比经验公式法[1]计算的结果要偏大,但更符合实际。 Of the drainage system,frame drainage well + flood discharging tunnel,for a certain tailings pond,the paper has carried out contrast calculation with two hydraulic calculation methods: empirical formula and computational fluid dynamics flow simulation(CFD) method.The discharge capacity of semi-pressure flow calculated with CFD method is bigger but more practical than that calculated with empirical formula method [1].
出处 《有色冶金设计与研究》 2011年第2期6-8,共3页 Nonferrous Metals Engineering & Research
关键词 经验公式法 CFD法 对比计算 empirical formula method computational fluid dynamics method(CFD) contrast calculation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献8

  • 1DL/T50581996.水电站调压室设计规范[S].[S].,..
  • 2Casey M, Innotec S. Best Practice Advance for CFD in Turbomachinery Design[ J]. QNET-CFD Network Newsletter,2003,2(3) :35- 37.
  • 3Shih T-H,Liou WW,Shabbir A, Zhu J. A New- k-ε Eddy-Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows-Model Development and Validation [ J ]. Computers Fluids, 1995,24 ( 3 ) : 227 - 238.
  • 4Launder BE, Spalding DB. The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows[J]. Computer Methods in Apphed Mechanics and Engineering, 1974, (3) :269 - 289.
  • 5Cebeci T, Bradshaw P. Momentum Transfer in Boundary Layers[ M ] . New York : Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1977.
  • 6Idelchik I E. Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance[M].2^nd Edition, New York:Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1986.
  • 7Miller D S. Internal flow a guide to losses in pipe and duct system [ M ] . The British Hydromechanics Research Association,1971.
  • 8蔡付林,胡明,曹青.有长连接管的阻抗式调压室阻抗损失系数研究[J].水电能源科学,2001,19(4):40-42. 被引量:22

共引文献28

同被引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部