期刊文献+

两种填料在土地处理系统中的应用

The Application of Two Fillers in Land Treatment System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选用陶粒和碎石作为填料,在不同的进水水质和水力负荷下,对土地处理系统的运行性能进行实验室模拟研究。试验结果表明:①以人工污水作为进水,在10 cm3/(cm2.d)的水力负荷下,碎石填料20 d完成挂膜,挂膜时间较陶粒填料短。②以人工污水作为试验进水,水力负荷为15 cm3/(cm2.d)时,陶粒和碎石填料的COD平均去除率分别为86.2%、84.6%;水力负荷为20 cm3/(cm2.d)时,COD平均去除率分别为78.2%、75.2%。③进水水质不同,COD去除效果存在较大差异。④陶粒填料表现出略优于碎石的COD去除效果,COD去除率较碎石填料高1.6%-8.6%。 In this experiment,ceramist and rubble are chosen as fillers and the operating characteristics of land treatment system is studied in lab-scale at different influent water qualities and hydraulic loadings.The experimental results are as follows: ①When artificial wastewater is used as influent,the time needed for film formation of rubble filler is 20 d at the hydraulic loading of 10 cm^3/(cm^2·d),it is shorter than that of ceramist;②When artificial wastewater is used as influent,COD removal of ceramist and rubble fillers is 86.2% and 84.6% respectively at the hydraulic loading of 15 cm^3/(cm^2·d),compared to 78.2% and 75.2% at a higher loading of 20 cm^3/(cm^2·d);③ Under different influent water qualities,COD removal rates are different;④In the above tests,COD removal of ceramist is 1.6%-8.6% higher than that of rubble.
出处 《工业安全与环保》 北大核心 2011年第4期12-14,共3页 Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection
关键词 土地处理 挂膜 水力负荷 陶粒 碎石 land treatment biofilm hydraulic loading ceramist rubble
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献5

  • 1[1]汪民,吴永锋,钟佐棠.等污木快速溶滤土地处理[M].第1版北京地质出版社.1993
  • 2[2]国家环境保护局科技标准司.城市污水上地处理指南[M].第1版北京:中国环境科学出版社.1997:139-150
  • 3[3]高拯民,李宪法,王绍堂,等.城市污木上地处理利用设计手册[M].北京:中国标准出版社.1991:390-402
  • 4[7]陈华癸.土壤生物学[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1981
  • 5[8]张祖,白瑛,李金铃.城市污水人工土快滤处理技术[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1991

共引文献499

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部