摘要
目的探讨团体心理干预对洪灾灾后居民焦虑、抑郁情绪的效果。方法按随机数字表法将364例江西抚州地区洪灾灾后居民随机分为干预组和对照组,每组182例。干预组进行为期1个月的一般性社会支持和团体心理治疗,对照组则仅给予一般性社会支持。以焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量(SDS)表评估疗效。结果干预前,干预组和对照组洪灾灾后居民SAS、SDS评分差异均无统计学意义(t=-0.225,P>0.05;t=-1.795,P>0.05);干预后,干预组灾后居民的SAS、SDS评分低于入组时,差异有统计学意义(t=-14.795,P<0.01;t=-19.600,P<0.01);对照组灾后居民的SAS、SDS评分低于入组时,差异有统计学意义(t=-13.347,P<0.01;t=-11.784,P<0.01);干预组和对照组SAS、SDS评分差异有统计学意义(t=5.063,P<0.01;t=2.764,P<0.01)。结论团体心理干预对洪灾灾后居民焦虑及抑郁情绪的改善有重要作用。
Objective To investigate the effect of group psychological intervention on anxiety and depression in victims after flood disaster.Methods A total of 364 flood victims in Fuzhou were randomly divided into two groups,with 182 victims in each group.Intervention group received general social support and group psychotherapy for 1 month,and control group was given general social support only.The efficacy was assessed by using Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale(SDS).Results No significant differences in scores of SAS and SDS were found between the two groups before intervention(t=-0.225,P0.05,t=-1.795,P0.05).After intervention,the scores of anxiety and depression obviously decreased in intervention group(t=-14.795,P0.01,t=-19.600,P0.01) and control group(t=-13.347,P0.01,t=-11.784,P0.01),and the differences in the scores were significant between the two groups(t=5.063,P0.01,t=2.764,P0.01).Conclusion Group psychotherapy plays an important role in treatment of anxiety and depression symptoms in victims after flood disaster.
出处
《南昌大学学报(医学版)》
CAS
2011年第1期1-3,共3页
Journal of Nanchang University:Medical Sciences
基金
"十一五"国家科技支撑计划(2008BAI68B08)
关键词
团体心理干预
社会支持
灾民
焦虑
抑郁
效果
抚州
江西
group psychological intervention
social support
victims
anxiety
depression
effect
Fuzhou
Jiangxi