期刊文献+

双寡头核心能力发展竞争、学习追随与核心能力均衡 被引量:4

The Duopoly's Game of Core Capability Development,Following Strategy by Learning and the Equilibrium of Core Capability
原文传递
导出
摘要 寡头是复杂的能力与知识系统,寡头核心能力发展竞争,实质上是独特知识积累的竞争。本文构建的双寡头核心能力发展与学习博弈模型表明,寡头学习类型、学习策略选择、学习努力水平、学习追随与初始知识积累水平,决定双寡头知识积累,进而决定核心能力发展均衡;博弈竞争条件下寡头学习追随可能导致学习无效。 The oligopoly is a complex knowledge and capability system.The development of oligopolies' core capabilities,in essence,is the competition of the accumulation of particular knowledge.In the paper,we build up a duopoly game model in combination with the oligopoly's core capability development and learning game.The model shows that the type of learning,the choice of learning strategies,the effort level of learning,the following strategy by learning and the accumulation of knowledge at the start of oligopoly game,commonly determine the oligopolies' knowledge accumulation and the equilibrium of their core capabilities development,and that the following strategy by learning may lead to the no-effect of the learning under the condition of game competition.
作者 肖绍平 邓超
机构地区 中南大学商学院
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期87-96,共10页 Management Review
基金 湖南省社会科学基金百人工程项目(05BR22)
关键词 核心竞争力 创新性学习 追随模仿性学习 博弈均衡 core capability innovative learning following of learning game equilibrium
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Prahalad,C.K., Hamel,G. The Core Competence of the Corporation[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1990,68(3):79-97.
  • 2Nonaka, I. The Knowledge-Creating Company[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1991,69(6):96-104.
  • 3Barney J.B. Firm Resources and Sustainable Competitive Advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 1991,17(1):99-120.
  • 4Barney J.B. Is the "Resource-based Review a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes"[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001,26(1):41-56.
  • 5Allee V. The Knowledge Evolution: Expand Organization Intelligence[J]. Boston:Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997,51(11):71-74.
  • 6Leonard-Barton, D. Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992,13(8):111-125.
  • 7Klein, Jeremy A., Peter G. Hiscocks. Competence-based Competition: A Practical Toolkit, in Competence-based Competition. G. Hamel and A. Heene (eds)[M]. John Wiley Sons Ltd, 1994.
  • 8Sanchez, R, Heene A., Thomas H.(eds). Dynamic of Competence-based Competition: Theory and Practice in the New Strategic ManazementfMI. Oxford. UK . New York: Perzamon. 1996.
  • 9Durand, Thomas. Strategizing for Innovation: Competence Analysis in Assesing Strategic Change, in Competence-based Strategic Management[M]. Aime Heene and Ron Sanchez(eds), Chichester: John Wiley, 1997.
  • 10Helfat, Peteraf. The Dynamic Resource-based View: Capability Life Cycles[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003. October Special Issue 24,(10):997-1010.

二级参考文献64

  • 1[1]Prahalad , C.K. & Hamel, G. The core competence of the corporation[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1990,68(5/6) :79 - 93.
  • 2[2]Itami, H. Mobilizing invisible assets. Cambridge[M]. MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
  • 3[3]Nonaka, I. The knowledge- creating company[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1991,69(6) :96 - 104.
  • 4[4]Lei, D., Hitt, M.A., & Bettis, R. Dynamic core competences through meta- learning and strategic context [ J ]. Journal of Management, 1996, (22) :549- 569.
  • 5[7]Chan, P. & Stolfo, S. Meta - learning for multistrategy and parallel learning Second International Workshop on Mutistrategy Learning. 1993.
  • 6[8]Huber, G. Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures[J]. Organization Science, 1991, (2): 88 - 115.
  • 7[9]Nevis, E. C, DiBella A. J, & Gould, J.M. Understanding organization as learning systems[J]. Sloan Management Review, Winter, 1995: 73 -85.
  • 8[10]Dutton, J.M., Fahey, L. & Narayanan, V.K. Toward understanding strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal [ J]. 1983,(4): 307 - 323.
  • 9成思危.复杂科学与管理[A]..香山科学会议第112次学术讨论会文集[C].北京,1999..
  • 10Sanchez R,Heene A,Thomas H.Theory and Practice of Competence-based Competition[M].New York:Pergomon Press,1995.

共引文献58

同被引文献37

  • 1洪江涛,陈俊芳.企业动态竞争战略选择的微分博弈分析[J].上海交通大学学报,2007,41(12):1975-1978. 被引量:7
  • 2Robert J.W Tijssen.Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science–technology interactions and knowledge flows[J]. Research Policy . 2001 (1)
  • 3F. XAVIERMOLINA‐MORALES.The Territorial Agglomerations of Firms: A Social Capital Perspective from the Spanish Tile Industry[J]. Growth and Change . 2005 (1)
  • 4Francis C.C. Koh,Winston T.H. Koh,Feichin Ted Tschang.An analytical framework for science parks and technology districts with an application to Singapore[J]. Journal of Business Venturing . 2003 (2)
  • 5PerDavidsson,BruceKirchhoff,AbdulnasserHatemi–J,HelenaGustavsson.Empirical Analysis of Business Growth Factors Using Swedish Data[J]. Journal of Small Business Management . 2002 (4)
  • 6Donald R. Davis,David E. Weinstein.Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: an empirical test[J]. Journal of International Economics . 2002 (1)
  • 7Yiannis L Bakouros,Dimitri C Mardas,Nikos C Varsakelis.Science park, a high tech fantasy?: an analysis of the science parks of Greece[J]. Technovation . 2001 (2)
  • 8Peter Lindel?f,Hans L?fsten.Proximity as a Resource Base for Competitive Advantage: University–Industry Links for Technology Transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer . 2004
  • 9Hans L?fsten,Peter Lindel?f.R&D networks and product innovation patterns—academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on Science Parks. Technovation . 2005
  • 10Olofsson,C,Wahlbin,C.Firms Started by University Researchers in Sweden-Roots,Roles,Relations and Growth Patterns. the1993Babson Entrepreneurship Research Conference . 1993

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部