摘要
[目的]对比观察德莫林和金因肽用于肛周皮肤损伤的效果。[方法]将62例因大便失禁致肛周皮肤损伤的老年病人按随机分组的方法分为对照组和观察组,每组31例。两组病人大便后均用湿纸巾擦拭,氧气吹干,对照组给予喷金因肽,观察组给予喷德莫林。[结果]对照组有效率为58.1%,观察组有效率为93.5%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]德莫林在肛周皮肤破溃中的应用效果优于金因肽。
Objective:To contrast the effect of Demo Lin and Gold for peptide used for crissum skin injury patients.Methods: A total of 62 senile patients with crissum skin injury caused by fecal incontinence were divided into control group and observation group,31 cases in each.After emptying the bowels,both group patients were cleaned and polished with wet paper towel,then the local skin was blew to dry by oxygen,control group patients were puffed Gold for peptide,but Demo Lin for observation group.Results: The effective rate was 58.1% in control group,and 93.5% in observation group,there was statistical significant difference between both groups(P0.01).Conclusion: The effect of Demo Lin for crissum skin ulceration is better than Gold for peptide.
出处
《护理研究(下旬版)》
2011年第3期776-777,共2页
Chinese Nursing Researsh
关键词
德莫林
金因肽
大便失禁
肛周皮肤损伤
Demo Lin
Gold for peptide
fecal incontinence
crissum skin injury