摘要
德里达和哈贝马斯的解释学思想透现出后现代主义的解构思潮和法兰克福学派的社会批判理论之间的张力。而另外两位哲学家波普尔和伽达默尔的思想也颇具特色,波普尔的证伪主义思想显示出另一类的历史偶因论视角,至于伽达默尔的解释学思想则是无批判和反认识论的。由此,哈贝马斯在与德里达、波普尔以及伽达默尔的对话中得出合理性理解是可能的结论。
The view of Derrida and Habermas' Hermeneutics is the opposition of the irrationalism and ationalism,which is deconstruction in postmodernism and criticism in Frankfort School.Then we use the falsificationism of Poper to represent the dispute.In the final analysis,the two who fall in the idealism historical view both regress to Kantism,Hegelism and never catch to Maxism's "historical materialism".
出处
《山西广播电视大学学报》
2011年第3期98-100,共3页
Journal of Shanxi Radio & TV University
关键词
能指与所指
批判
反思
证伪主义
合理性
signifier and denotatum
criticism
self-examination
falsificationism
rationality