期刊文献+

6针法和10针法前列腺穿刺活检术诊断前列腺癌效果比较 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较10针法和6针法前列腺穿刺活检术诊断前列腺癌的效果。方法怀疑前列腺癌的患者385例,随机分为A组220例和B组165例。A组行标准6针法、B组采用10针法行前列腺穿刺活检。比两组前列腺癌检出率和术后不良反应发生情况。结果 A、B组前列腺癌检出率分别为31.8%(70/220)和43.6%(72/165),两组相比,P<0.05。两组术后不良反应发生率无明显差别(P均>0.05)。结论 10针法前列腺穿刺活检术用于前列腺癌诊断比标准6针法前列腺癌检出率高。
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第10期82-83,共2页 Shandong Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Hodge KK,Mcneal JE,Terris MK,et al.Random systermatic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate[J].J Urol,1989,142(1):71-74.
  • 2Epstein JI,Walsh PC,Sauvageot J,et al.Use of repeat sextant and transition zone biopsies for assessing extent of prostate cancer[J].J Urol,1997,158(5):1886-1890.
  • 3Chen ME,Troncoso P,Johnston DA,et al.Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis[J].J Urol,1997,158(6):2168-2175.
  • 4Berger AP,Gozzi C,Steiner H,et al.Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy:a comparison among 3 protocols with 6,10 and 15 cores[J].J Urol,2004,171(4):1478-1480.
  • 5山刚志,金杰,郭应禄.不同前列腺穿刺活检方案检出前列腺癌的比较[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(1):40-42. 被引量:24
  • 6Norberg M,Egevad I,Holmber-Sparen P,et al.The sextant protocol for ultrasound guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer[J].Urology,1997,50(4):562-566.
  • 7Eskicorapci SY,Baydar DE,Akbal C,et al.Optimization of prostatic biopsy:a prospective randomized trial comparing the sextant biopsy with a 10-core biopsy[J].Eur Urol,2004,45(4):444-448.
  • 8Matsubara A,Mutaguchi K,Yasumoto H,et al.Transrectal ultrasound-guided 10-core biopsy of the prostate for Japanese patients[J].Hiroshima J Med Sci,2006,55(2):65-70.
  • 9Paul R,Scholer S,van Randenborgh H,et al.Morbidity of prostatic biopsy for different biopsy strategies:is there a relation to core number and sampling region[J].Eur Urol,2004,45(4):450-455.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Matlaga BR,Eskew LA,McCullough DL.Prostate biopsy:indications and technique.J Urol,2003 ,169 :12-19.
  • 2Eskew LA,Bare RL,McCullough DL.Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate.J Urol,1997,157:199-202.
  • 3Bauer JJ,Zeng J,Weir J,et al.Three-dimensional computer-simulated prostate models:lateral prostate biopsies increase the detection rate of prostate cancer.Urology,1999,53:961-967.
  • 4Wefer AE,Hricak H,Vigneron DB,et al.Sextant localization of prostate cancer:comparison of sextant biopsy,magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology.J Urol,2000,164:400-404.
  • 5Presti JC Jr,Chang JJ,Bhargava V,et al.The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies:results of a prospective clinical trial.J Urol,2000,163:163-166.
  • 6Naughton CK,Miller DC,Mager DE,et al.A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores:impact on cancer detection.J Urol,2000,164:388-392.
  • 7Berger AP,Gozzi C,Steiner H,et al.Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy:a comparison among 3 protocols with 6,10 and 15 cores.J Urol,2004,171:1478-1480.
  • 8Paul R,Scholer S,van Randenborgh H,et al.Morbidity of prostatic biopsy for different biopsy strategies:is there a relation to core number and sampling region? Eur Urol,2004,45:450-455.
  • 9Eskicorapci SY,Baydar DE,Akbal C,et al.An extended 10-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate cancer.Eur Urol,2004 ,45 :444-448.

共引文献23

同被引文献70

  • 1周晓光,张杰.前列腺癌内分泌治疗现状与研究进展[J].世界临床药物,2009,30(11):641-645. 被引量:2
  • 2吴琪俊,徐剑锋,施榕.前列腺癌易感基因及遗传流行病学研究进展[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2011,31(5):672-675. 被引量:10
  • 3李飞宇,王霄英,丁建平,周良平,肖江喜,蒋学祥.良性前列腺增生的MRS与血清PSA、PSAD相关性初步研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2004,20(8):1164-1167. 被引量:7
  • 4周良平,王霄英,李飞宇,丁建平,蒋学祥.正常中国成年男性前列腺MRS的研究:解剖区域和年龄的影响[J].实用放射学杂志,2005,21(7):731-735. 被引量:20
  • 5Xu ZB, Wang GM,Sun LA, et al. The incidence of prostatic carci- noma in Shanghai[J]. Chin J Clin Med, 2003, 10:344 - 346.
  • 6Francisco RC. alejandro GR, Bemardo "AD, ei al. Extended sam- piing at first biopsy improves cancer detection rate: results of a pro- spective, randomized trial comparing 12 versus 18-core prostate bi- opsy[J]. J Urol, 2011,7:2132-2136.
  • 7Sakr WA, Grignon DJ, Crissman JD, et al. High grade prostatic in- traepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostatic denoearcinoma be-t tween the ages of 20-69: an autopsy study of 249 eases[ J]. In Vi- vo, 1994,8:439-443.
  • 8O' Connell M J, Smith CS, Fitzpatrick PE, et al. Transrectal ultra- sound-guided biopsy of the prostate gland : value of 12 versus 6 cores [J]. Abdom Imaging, 2004, 29:132-136.
  • 9Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, et al. Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review[J]. Urology, 2006, 175:1605-1612.
  • 10ABD TY, Goodman M, Hall J, et al. Comparison of 12-core Versus 8-core prostate biopsy : multivariate analysis of large series of US vet- erans[J]. Urology, 2011, 77 (3):541-547.

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部