期刊文献+

中医证候分类和复杂干预措施是影响中医临床疗效评价的核心问题 被引量:8

下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着国内外对中医药研究的不断深入,越来越多的中医药疗效得到认可[1],同时,随着临床流行病学与循证医学的发展以及中医药临床研究的深入,中医药临床疗效评价的相关研究得到广泛开展。
出处 《中国中西医结合杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期449-451,共3页 Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1The Chinese Herbal Remedy Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. f. in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis [ J ]. Ann Intern Med, 2009,151(4) :1 -36.
  • 2吕爱平,陈可冀.疾病的证候分类研究思路[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2005,25(9):843-845. 被引量:20
  • 3吕爱平.中医证候理论对疾病治疗思想的影响[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2001,21(4):309-311. 被引量:16
  • 4He Y, Lu A, Zha Q, et al. Correlations between symptoms as assessed in traditional Chinese medicine and ACR20 effi- cacy response: a study in 396 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with TCM or Western medicine [ J ]. J Clin Rheumatol, 2007,13 (6) : 317 - 321.
  • 5He Y, Lu A, Zha Y, et al. Differential effect on symptoms treated with traditional Chinese medicine and Western com- bination therapy in RA patients [ J ]. Complement Ther Med, 2008,16(4) :206 -211.
  • 6MacPherson H. Pragmatic clinical trials [ J ]. Complement Ther Med, 2004, 12 (213) :136 - 140.
  • 7Verhoef M J, Lewithb G, Ritenbaughc C, et al. Comple- mentary and alternative medicine whole systems research: beyond identification of inadequacies of the RCT[ J]. Complement Ther Med, 2005,13 (3) ,206 - 212.
  • 8Karanicolas PJ, Montori VM, Devereaux PJ, et al. A new "mechanistic-practical" framework for designing and inter- preting randomized trials [ J ]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2009,62 (5) :479 -484.
  • 9Jansen YJ, Bal R, Bruijnzeels M, et al. Coping with methodological dilemmas: about establishing the effectiveness of interventions in routine medical practice [ J ]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2006,13(6) :160.

二级参考文献10

共引文献29

同被引文献116

  • 1祝世讷.中医药自主创新的战略优势——复杂性[J].天津中医药,2007,24(1):5-7. 被引量:7
  • 2中药新药临床研究指导原则(试行)[M].北京中国医药科技出版社,2002.
  • 3Marja Verhoef, George Lewithb, Cheryl Ritenbaughc, et al. Complementary and ahemative medicine whole systems re- search: beyond identification of inadequacies of the RCT [ J ]. Complementary Therapies Med, 2005, 13(3) : 206 -212.
  • 4Ernst E. Usage of complementary therapies in rheumatolo- gy: a systematic review [Jl. Clin Rheumatol, 1998, 17 (4) : 301 -305.
  • 5Ritenbaugh C, Verhoef M, Fleishman S, et al. Whole sys- tems research: a discipline for studying complementary and alternative medicine [ J ]. Altern Ther Health Med, 2003,9 (4) ,32 -36.
  • 6Verhoef M J, Lewith G, Ritenbaugh C, et al. Complemen- tary and alternative medicine whole systems research: be- yond identification of inadequacies of the RCT [ J ]. Com- plement Ther Med, 2005, 13 (3) : 206 - 212.
  • 7Martin R, David JT. Understanding controlled trials: What are pragmatic trials[J]. BMJ, 1998, 316(1) : 285.
  • 8Hugh MP. Pragmatic clinical trials [ J ]. Complement Ther Med, 2004, 12(1): 136-140.
  • 9Bower P, King M, Nazareth I, et al. Patient preferences in randomised controlled trials: conceptual framework and im- plications for research [ J ]. Soc Sci Med, 2005, 61 (3) :685 -695.
  • 10Price JD, Evans JG. N-of-1 randomised controlled trials (n-of-1 trials) : singularly useful in geriatric medicine[ J~. Age Ageing, 2002,31 (4) :227 - 232.

引证文献8

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部