期刊文献+

Non-platinum doublets versus single agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with elderly age and/or poor performance status: a meta-analysis

Non-platinum doublets versus single agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with elderly age and/or poor performance status: a meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学习的目的是在以前未经治疗的先进非小的房间肺癌症(NSCLC ) 把非铂马甲(马甲组) 的功效和毒性与一个非铂单身者代理人(单个代理人的组) 作比较的目的有老年龄或差的表演地位(PS ) 的病人。PubMed 数据库被屏蔽的方法。随后,为全面幸存( OS )的危险比率( HR )和没有前进的幸存( PFS ),为全面反应的相对风险( RR )评价( ORR )并且一个年幸存,并且为毒性的不同类型的机会比率( ORs )用评论经理 5.0 包裹被分享。这研究 1427 个病人包括了的结果在四注册了使随机化的控制试用。分享的 HR 证明马甲组能增加 ORR (P = 0.002 ) 没有异质(P = 0.64 ) ,并且可能改进 OS (P = 0.01 / P = 0.06 ) 与异质(P < 0.001 ) 。在 PFS 没有重要差别(P = 0.16 ) 并且一个年幸存(P = 0.25 ) 在二个治疗组之间。马甲组比单个代理人的组导致了更多的等级 3/4 嗜中性白血球减少症和 thrombocytopenia (P = 0.02 并且 P = 0.000,分别地) 。等级 3/4 贫血症的发生,呕吐,在二个治疗组之间的 mucositis,便秘,腹泻, neurotoxicity,过敏症,和疲劳是不足道的。结论除了嗜中性白血球减少症和 thrombocytopenia,非铂马甲能增加 ORR,和力量没有更多的副作用的增加,与老年龄或差的 PS 为 NSCLC 病人改进 OS;然而,马甲显示出嗜中性白血球减少症和 thrombocytopenia 的增加的率。马甲的增加不能改进 PFS 和一个年幸存。 Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacies and toxicities of non-platinum doublets (doublets group) with a non-platinum single agent (single-agent group) in previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with elderly age and/or poor performance status (PS). Methods: The PubMed database was screened. Subsequently, the hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), relative risks (RRs) for overall response rate (ORR) and one-year survival, and odds ratios (ORs) for the different types of toxicities were pooled using the Review Manager 5.0 package. Results: This study comprised of 1427 patients enrolled in four randomized controlled trials. The pooled HR showed that the doublet group could increase ORR (P = 0.002) with no heterogeneity (P = 0.64), and might improve OS (P = 0.01 / P = 0.06) with heterogeneity (P 0.001). There was no significant difference in PFS (P = 0.16) and one-year survival (P = 0.25) between two treatment groups. The doublet group led to more grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia than the single-agent group (P = 0.02 and P = 0.000, respectively). The incidences of grade 3/4 anemia, vomiting, mucositis, constipation, diarrhea, neurotoxicity, allergy, and fatigue between the two treatment groups were insignificant. Conclusion: Except for neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, the non-platinum doublets could increase ORR, and might improve OS for NSCLC patients with elderly age and/or poor PS without addition of more side effects; however, the doublets showed an increased rate of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The addition of doublets may not improve PFS and one-year survival.
出处 《The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology》 CAS 2011年第3期134-139,共6页 中德临床肿瘤学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by a grant of Major Science and Technology Project of "National Significant New Drug Creation" (No. 2008ZX09312-002)
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 Meta分析 双峰 单药 患者 年龄 老人 状态 fielderly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) meta-analysis doublets single non-platinum
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Avery EJ,Kessinger A,Ganti AK.Therapeutic options for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer Treat Rev,2009,35:340–344.
  • 2Langer CJ.Neglected and underrepresented subpopulations:elderly and performance status 2 patients with advanced-stage non-smallcell lung cancer.Clin Lung Cancer,2006,7 Suppl 4:S126–137.
  • 3Beretta GD,Michetti G,Belometti MO,et al.Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in elderly or unfit patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Br J Cancer,2000,83:573–576.
  • 4Comella P,Frasci G,Carnicelli P,et al.Gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients.Br J Cancer,2004,91:489–497.
  • 5Hesketh PJ,Chansky K,Lau DH,et al.Sequential vinorelbine and docetaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients age 70 and older and/or with a performance status of 2:a phase II trial of the Southwest Oncology Group (S0027).J Thorac Oncol,2006,1:537–544.
  • 6Hainsworth JD,Spigel DR,Farley C,et al.Weekly docetaxel versus docetaxel/gemcitabine in the treatment of elderly or poor performance status patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer:a randomized phase 3 trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network.Cancer,2007,110:2027–2034.
  • 7Sawhney R,Sehl M,Naeim A.Physiologic aspects of aging:impact on cancer management and decision making,part I.Cancer J,2005,11:449–460.
  • 8Sehl M,Sawhney R,Naeim A.Physiologic aspects of aging:impact on cancer management and decision making,part II.Cancer J,2005,11:461–473.
  • 9Earle CC,Neumann PJ,Gelber RD,et al.Impact of referral patterns on the use of chemotherapy for lung cancer.J Clin Oncol,2002,20:1786–1792.
  • 10Leong SS,Toh CK,Lim WT,et al.A randomized phase II trial of single-agent gemcitabine,vinorelbine,or docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who have poor performance status and/or are elderly.J Thorac Oncol,2007,2:230–236.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部