期刊文献+

Traditional Agrodiversity Management:A Case Study of Central Himalayan Village Ecosystem

Traditional Agrodiversity Management:A Case Study of Central Himalayan Village Ecosystem
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Environmental,biological,socio-cultural and economic status variation existing in the Central Himalaya have led to the evolution of diverse and unique traditional agroecosystems,crop species and livestock,which facilitate the traditional mountain farming societies to sustain themselves.Indigenous agroecosystems are highly site specific and differ from place to place,as they have evolved along divergent lines.For maintenance of traditional agrodiversity management the farmers of the Central Himalaya have evolved various types of crop rotations in consonance with the varied environmental conditions and agronomic requirements.In irrigated flat lands two crops are harvested in a year with negligible fallow period but in rainfed conditions if a cropping sequence is presumed to be starting after winter fallow phase then four major cropping seasons can be identified namely first kharif season(first crop season),first rabi season(second crop season),second kharif season(third crop season) and second rabi season(fourth crop season).Highest crop diversity is present in kharif season in comparison to rabi season.Traditionally the fields are left fallow after harvest of the second kharif season crop.Important characteristics of agrodiversity management are the use of bullocks for draughtpower,human energy as labour,crop residues as animal feed and animal waste mixed with forest litter as organic input to restore soil fertility levels.Women provide most of the human labour except for ploughing and threshing grain.The present study deals with assessment of traditional agrodiversity management such as(i) crop diversity,(ii) realized yield under the traditional practices and(iii) assess the differences of realized yields under sole and mixed cropping systems.It indicated that crop rotation is an important feature of the Central Himalayan village ecosystem which helps to continue the diversity of species grown,as are the distribution of crops in the growing period and the management of soil fertility.The cropping diversity existing and the sequences practiced by the traditional farmers seems to have achieved high degree of specialization and thus even when the yield/biomass variations are about 60%,the farmers continue to practice these sequences as they need to maintain diversity and synergistic relationships of crops in addition to manage the food and labour requirements for crop husbandry.Crop yields are generally higher in irrigated systems than rainfed systems and in sole cropping as compared with mixed cropping.However,gross biological and economic yields are higher in mixed cropping than sole cropping systems. Environmental, biological, socio-cultural and economic status variation existing in the Central Himalaya have led to the evolution of diverse and unique traditional agroecosystems, crop species and livestock, which facilitate the traditional mountain farming societies to sustain themselves. Indigenous agroecosystems are highly site specific and differ from place to place, as they have evolved along divergent lines. For maintenance of traditional agrodiversity management the farmers of the Central Himalaya have evolved various types of crop rotations in consonance with the varied environmental conditions and agronomic requirements. In irrigated fiat lands two crops are harvested in a year with negligible fallow period but in rainfed conditions if a cropping sequence is presumed to be starting after winter fallow phase then four major cropping seasons can be identified namely first kharif season (first crop season), first rabi season (second crop season), second kharif season (third crop season) and second rabi season (fourth crop season). Highest crop diversity is present in kharif season in comparison to rabi season. Traditionally the fields are left fallow after harvest of the second kharif season crop. Important characteristics of agrodiversity management are the use of bullocks for draughtpower, human energy as labour, crop residues as animal feed and animal waste mixed with forest litter as organic input to restore soil fertility levels. Women provide most of the human labour except for ploughing and threshing grain. The present study deals with assessment of traditional agrodiversity management such as (i) crop diversity, (ii) realized yield under the traditional practices and (iii) assess the differences of realized yields under sole and mixed cropping systems. It indicated that crop rotation is an important feature of the Central Himalayan village ecosystem which helps to continue the diversity of species grown, as are the distribution of crops in the growing period and the management of soil fertility. The cropping diversity existing and the sequences practiced by the traditional farmers seems to have achieved high degree of specialization and thus even when the yield/biomass variations are about 6o%, the farmers continue to practice these sequences as they need to maintain diversity and synergistic relationships of crops in addition to manage the food and labour requirements for crop husbandry. Crop yields are generally higher in irrigated systems than rainfed systems and in sole cropping as compared with mixed cropping. However, gross biological and economic yields are higher in mixed cropping than sole cropping systems.
出处 《Journal of Mountain Science》 SCIE CSCD 2011年第1期62-74,共13页 山地科学学报(英文)
关键词 喜马拉雅山 传统习俗 管理维护 中央 农业生态系统 生态村 土壤肥力水平 作物多样性 Traditional agricultural practices Himalayas Rainfed Management
  • 相关文献

参考文献53

  • 1Adjei-Nsiah S, Kuyper TW, Leeuwis C, Abekoe MK, Giller KE (2007) Evaluating sustainable and profitable cropping sequences with cassava and four legume crops: Effects on soil fertility and maize yields in the forest/savannah transitional agro-ecological zone of Ghana. Field Crops Research 103:89- 97.
  • 2Agegnehu G, Ghizaw A, Sinebo W (2006a) Crop productivity and land-use efficiency of a Teff/faba bean mixed cropping system in tropical highland environment. Exprimental Agriculture 42:495-504.
  • 3Agegnehu G, Ghizaw A, Sinebo W (2006b) Yield performance and land-use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopia highlands. European Journal of Agronomy 25:202-207.
  • 4Anderson RL (2005) Are some crops synergistic to following crops? Agronomy Journal 97:7-10.
  • 5Anil AL, Park J, Philips RH, Miller FA (1998) Temperate inter cropping of cereals for forage: A review of the potential for growth and utilization with particular reference to the UK. Grass and Forage Science 53:301-317.
  • 6Babatunde FE (2000) Effect of intercropping and cropping sequence on the marketable yield and productivity of Celosia and okra. Journal of Agriculture and Environment 1:55-61.
  • 7Babatunde FE (2003) Intercrop productivity of roselle in Nigeria. Africa Crop Science Journal 11:43-47.
  • 8Benites JR, McCollum RE, Nederman GC (1993) Production efficiency of intercrops relative to sequentially planted sole crop in humid tropical environment. Field Crops Research 31:1-18.
  • 9Blaek AL, Siddoway FW, Brown PL (1974) Summer fallow in the northern great plains (winter wheat) In: Summer Fallow in the Western United States. USDA Conservation Research Report, 17 USDA, Washington. pp 36-50.
  • 10Borrini-Feyerband G (1996) Collaborative Management of Protected Areas: Tailoring the Approach to the Context. IUCN-The World Conservation Union. Gland.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部