期刊文献+

两种术式治疗腰椎滑脱症的疗效比较 被引量:1

Efficacy Comparision of Two Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with Different Surgical
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较后路椎体间椎间融合器(cage)融合加椎弓根螺钉内固定术(PLIF)与侧后方植骨融合加椎弓根螺钉内固定术(PLF)治疗腰椎滑脱症的疗效。方法研究自2008年3月至2010年3月接受椎弓根螺钉内固定加融合治疗的腰椎滑脱症患者60例,随机分为PLIF组(n=32)和PLF组(n=28),随访6个月~2年,在不同的时间点观察所有患者的腰椎椎间隙高度、腰椎融合率,根据随访的结果对两组进行比较。结果施术的60例患者均获得了完整的随访,结果显示PLIF组与PLF组之间在椎间隙高度、融合率方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 PLIF在治疗腰椎滑脱症时在椎间隙高度、融合率方面均明显优于PLF。 Objective A comparison of the efficacy of the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis between the two methods,posterior lumbar Interbody fusion cage(cage) fusion and pedicle screw fixation(PLIF) fusion and the side of the rear side pedicle screw fixation(PLF).Method Study from 60 patients,who received pedicle screw fixation and fusion for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis from March 2008 to March 2010.They were randomly divided into PLIF group(n=32) and the PLF group(n=28),and were followed up for 6 months to 2 years.During this period,all patients' lumbar intervertebral space height and lumbar fusion rate were observed at different time points.Then researcher compared the effects of the two groups according to the results of follow-up.Results The 60 patients have received a complete follow-up,and the study results showed that the PLF group and the PLIF group have significant statistic differences in the disc space height and fusion rates(P0.05).Conclusion PLIF is significantly better than PLF in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis in terms of intervertebral space height and fusion rate.
出处 《医药论坛杂志》 2010年第24期26-28,32,共4页 Journal of Medical Forum
关键词 腰椎滑脱症 脊柱融合术 椎间融合器 后外侧植骨融合 lumbar spondylolisthesis Spinal fusion Cage Posterolateral fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Meyerding HW. Spondylo listhesis Surg [ J ]. Ggynecol Obstet, 1932, 54: 3371-3373.
  • 2Kuslich SD, Ulstrom cL, Griffith SL, et al. The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion. Histo- ry, techniques, and 2 - year follow - up results of a U- nited States prospective, multicenter trim [ J ]. Spine, 1998,23 : 1267-1278.
  • 3刘锦波,袁盛茂,狄东华,赵建忠,沈铁成,巫金龙,曹旭东.胸腰椎椎弓根内固定系统并发症的处理和预防[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2002,9(3):303-304. 被引量:5
  • 4Kualieh SD, Danielson G, Dowdle JD, et al. Four- years follow - up results of lumbar spine arthrodesis u- sing the Bagby and Knslieh lumbar fusion Cage [ J ]. Spine ,2000,25 ( 20 ) :2656.
  • 5Schlegel KF, PON A. Biomechanics of posterior lumbar in terbody fusion in spondylolisthesis [ J ]. Clin Orthop, 1985,193 : 115-119.
  • 6Christopher MB, Casey KL. Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years : influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome [ J ]. Spine,2004,29 ( 4 ) :455-463.
  • 7Brantigan JW, Steffee AD, Lewis MI, et al.Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F Cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle CI ' eW placement system: two - years results from a food and drag adminstration investigational device exemption clinical trial [ J ]. Spine, 2000,25 ( 11 ) : 1437.
  • 8Swan J, Hurwitz E, Malek F, et al. Surgical treatment for unstable low - grade isthemic spend, listhesis in adults : a prospective controlled study of posterior instrumented fu- sion compared with combined anterior - prosterior fusion [ J ]. Spine J,2006,6 ( 6 ) :606.

二级参考文献4

共引文献4

同被引文献17

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部