期刊文献+

不同胰管引流方式在胰肠吻合术后的疗效比较 被引量:6

The effect of different drainage of pancreatic duct after pancreaticojejunostomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同胰管引流方式对胰肠吻合术后胰瘘发生的影响。方法回顾性地分析122例胰十二指肠切除患者的临床资料,122例中36例胰管内置管外引流,67例胰管内置管内引流,19例胰管内未置管引流。结果胰管内置管引流103例中21例(20.4%)发生胰瘘,胰管内置管外引流36例中4例(11.1%)发生胰瘘,胰管内置管内引流67例中17例(25.4%)发生胰瘘;而19例胰管内未置管引流病例中5例(26.3%)发生胰瘘。胰管引流组术后胰瘘发生率与胰管非引流组比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。胰管内引流组术后胰瘘发生率与胰管外引流组比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论胰十二指肠切除术中胰肠吻合时胰管内安置引流与否似与术后胰瘘的发生率无明显关系。 Objective To study the effect of different medthods of pancreatic duct drainage on prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods The clinical records of 122 patients who underwent standard pancreaticoduodenectomy were analyzed,retrospectively.The stented drainage of pancreatic duct was used in 103 of 122patients,including stented external drainage of pancreatic duct in 36 patients,and stented internal drainage of pancreatic duct in 67 patients;and without stented drainage in 19 patients. Results Pancreatic fistula was identified in 21of 103 patients in the drained group(4 in the stented external drainaged group and 17 in the stented internal drainaged group),and in 5 of 19 patients in the nondrained group.The incidence of pancreatic fistula in the drained group(20.4%) had no significant difference compared with the nondrained group(26.3%,P0.05),and the incidence of pancreatic fistula in the stented external drained group(11.1%) had no significant differenced compared with the stented internal drained group(25.4%,P0.05). Conclusions Comparing the incidence of pancreatic fistula from both groups,the authors believe that the stented drainage of pancreatic duct does not significantly reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
出处 《中国普通外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期238-240,共3页 China Journal of General Surgery
关键词 胰十二指肠切除术 胰瘘 胰管引流 Pancreaticoduodenectomy Pancreatic Fistula Pancreatic Duct Drainage
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献97

共引文献131

同被引文献71

  • 1郁新,王芳,袁菲菲.腹腔三套管在胰十二指肠切除术中的应用及护理[J].实用临床医药杂志,2013,17(8):1-3. 被引量:4
  • 2邹宝波,程科萍,何琅,刘金满,王健,陈炳为,邱海波,沈其君.外科患者手术后切口感染危险因素的logistic回归分析[J].现代医学,2005,33(2):98-100. 被引量:32
  • 3吴秀珍.高血压性颅内血肿微创术后107例引流的护理.安庆医学,2007,28(2):23-24.
  • 4陈巧巧 黄萍.应用封闭式负压引流技术治疗大面积感染创面的观察及护理.国际医药卫生导报,2011,4(2):121-121.
  • 5Rodgers AD,Cummins AG. CRP correlates with clinical scare in-ulctratvie colitis but not in crohn's disease. Dig Dis Sci ,2007,52(9):2063-2067.
  • 6Reyes K,Malik R,Moore C,et al. Evaluation of risk factors forcoinfection or cocolonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococ-cus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Micro-bid,2010,48(2) :628-630.
  • 7EI Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A, et al. Pancreatic anastomotic leak-age after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience)[J]. World J Surg, 2013,37(6):1405-1418. doi:10.1007/s00268-13-1998-s.
  • 8Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, et al. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2013, 216(1): 1-14.
  • 9Ito Y, Kenmochi T, Irino T, et al. Strategies to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Heptogastroenterology, 2012,59(120): 2609-2613.
  • 10Ramacciato G, Mercantini P, Petrucciani N, et al. Risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A collective review[J]. Am Surg, 2011,77(3): 257-269.

引证文献6

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部