摘要
环境公益诉讼是补救环境管理中政府失灵的良方,但当前中国的环境公益诉讼研究存在严重缺陷。环境公益诉讼的研究,应该借鉴"生成性思维"以及"法的生成"理论,环境公益诉讼的制度生成研究由此产生。制度生成视角下推进环境公益诉讼应该坚持保守的态度,选择渐进的思路。在司法中,应着重在发挥私益诉讼的公益保护功能,并结合能动司法理念和尝试性司法实践有序推进环境公益诉讼;在立法中,应选择适当的环境公益诉讼立法模式,并以类型化方法确定环境公益诉讼的原告资格。
Environmental public interest litigation(EPIL) is an effective prescription for government environmental failure,but there exists critical defect in nowadays China's EPIL research.So we should learn from the theory of generative thinking and law generation when we launch an EPIL research,which lead to gender the system generation research of EPIL.We should also stick to the conservative attitude and progressive ideas when we promote the EPIL research under the perspective of system generation.In judicial,the orderly advancement of EPIL should put emphasis on three aspects,which are developing the public interest protection function of private interest litigation,combing with the idea of active judicial and tentatively judicial practice.In the legislation,we should choose an appropriate EPIL legislation mode and select plaintiff qualification of EPIL from the stereotype angle.
出处
《中国软科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第4期88-96,67,共10页
China Soft Science
基金
教育部人文社会科学基金项目(09YJC820025)"论生态制度文明的建设路径"
河海大学人文社会科学基金项目(2008420911)"河海大学研究生精品课程建设项目"(2084-H0800303)
河海大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2010B18414)"农村环境法制建设的基础理论探究"
关键词
环境公益诉讼
生成性思维
制度生成
司法推进
立法推进
environmental public interest litigation(EPIL)
generative thinking
system generation
judicial advancement
legislation advancement