期刊文献+

构思策略教学改善小学写困生故事文质量的实验研究 被引量:4

An Experimental Study on Enhancing Story-writing Quality of Pupils with Writing Difficulties through Planning Strategy Instruction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用实验组、控制组前后测实验设计,运用SRSD策略教学模式,对23名小学写困生进行构思策略的训练。实验结果表明,在训练之前,实验组与控制组学生在故事文的长度、6项分质量指标及总体质量上的得分差异均不显著;但在接受策略教学后,实验组学生所写的后测故事文在情节吸引力、条理清晰度和总体质量上的平均得分均显著优于控制组学生,其总体质量的改善效应为0.80。因此,构思策略的教学能显著改善小学写困生的故事文写作质量。 Using a pre-test and post-test experimental design, and through SRSD strategy instruction model, 23 pupils with writing difficulties were taught strategies of planning. The results showed that before the training, differences on story length, six quality items and overall quality between experimental group and control group were not significant. But following instruction, compared to control group, students in experimental group got significantly higher scores on plot attractiveness, order clarity and overall quality. Effect size on experimental group' s overall quality was up to O. 80. Therefore, story-writing quality of pupils with writing difficulties can be significantly enhanced through instruction of planning strategies.
作者 田澜 张大均
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期282-288,共7页 Psychological Development and Education
关键词 小学生 写作困难 构思 策略教学 pupils writing difficulty planning strategy instruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Bereiter, C. , & Scardamalia, M. ( 1987 ). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 11 - 13.
  • 2Cohen,J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). New York : Academic Press, 16 - 17.
  • 3De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (1997), Effects of dictation and advanced planning instruction on the composing of students with writing and learning problems. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (2), 203 - 222.
  • 4Graham, S. , & Harris, K. R. (1997). Self-regulation and writing:Where do we go from here? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 102 -114.
  • 5Graham, S, & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In: Swanson L. H, Harris K, Graham S, editors. Handbook of learning disabilities. New York : Guilford,323 - 344.
  • 6Graham, S. , Harris, K. R. , & Mason, L. H. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30( 2 ), 207 -241.
  • 7Graham, S. , Harris, K. R. , & Reid, R. (1992). Developing self- regulated learners. Focus on Exceptional Children, 24(6), 1 -16.
  • 8Guzel-Ozmen, R. (2006). The effectiveness of modified cognitive strategy instruction in writing with mildly mentally retarded Turkish students. Exceptional Children, 72 ( 3 ) ,281 - 297.
  • 9Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1992). Self-regulated strategy development: A part of the writing process. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris, & J. Guthrie ( Eds. ), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school. New York: Academic Press, 277 -309.
  • 10Harris, K. R., Graham, S. , & Mason, L. H. (2003). Self-regulated strategy development in the classroom: Part of a balanced approach to writing instruction for students with disabilities. Focusing on Exceptional Children, 35(7 ), 1 - 16.

二级参考文献22

  • 1戴健林,莫雷.西方关于写作过程的自我调控研究的进展[J].心理发展与教育,1999,15(3):54-57. 被引量:13
  • 2张肇丰.当代西方写作过程模式的研究与发展[J].心理科学,2003,26(2):346-347. 被引量:16
  • 3朱作仁.小学生作文量表[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,1990..
  • 4Noel G, Nancy M. School Is Fun at Recess: Informal Analyses of Written Language for Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Volume 35, Number I, January/Febuary, 2002, 7 - 22.
  • 5Ralph P F, Charles A M, Nancy S D. The Effects of an Elaborated Goal on the Persuasive Writing of Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Nurmally Achieving Peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000, Vol, 92, No. 4,694 - 702.
  • 6Ralph P F, Charles A M, Nancy S D. The Effects of an Elaborated Goal on the Persuasive Writing of Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Normally Achieving Peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000, Vol. 92, No. 4,694 - 702.
  • 7Page-Voth V, Graham S. Effects of Goal Setting and Strategy Use on the Writing Performance and Self-Efficacy of Studenta With Writing and Learning Problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999, vol. 91, No, 2,230 - 240.
  • 8Virginia W B, Katherine V, Robert D A, Kristin B C. Gerald,Gerald Curtio, Jill Minich Hawkins and Steve Graham. Teaching Spelling and Comprehension Alone and Together: Implications for the Simple View of Writing. Journal of Educational psychology. 2002,Vol .94,No.2,291 - 304.
  • 9Nixon J G, Topping K J. Emergent Writing: the impact of structured peer interaction. Educational Psychology, 2001,21, 41 - 58.
  • 10Bereiter C,Butis P,Scardamadia M.Cognitive operations in constructing main points in written composition. Journal of Memoryand Language, 1988 ;27:261-278

共引文献24

同被引文献19

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部