摘要
目的:回顾性比较肱骨干中下1/3骨折不同入路的临床疗效,以期对肱骨干中下1/3骨折治疗有所帮助.方法:对68例患者进行描述分析,采用SPSS14.5软件进行统计分析.结果:所有病例均获6~22月随访,两种手术入路治疗后,患者骨折愈合率、骨折愈合时间、肘关节功能比较无统计学意义(P〉0.05).结论:两种手术入路治疗在临床实践中取决于医师的解剖入路熟练度及习惯.
Objective: In the review comparison brachium backbone the next 1/3 bone fracture different admission passage clinical curative effect,the next 1/3 bone fracture treatment has the help by the time to the brachium backbone in. Methods:Carries on the description analysis to 68 example patients, uses the SPSS14. 5 software to carry on the statistical analysis. Results:All case of illness attain for 6-22 months to make a follow-up visit, after two kind of operative approach treatment, the patient bone fracture recovery rate, the bone fracture cicatrization time, the elbow joint function compare the non-statistics significance (P〉0.05). Conclusion:Two kind of Operative approach treatment is decided in the clinical practice by doctor's dissection admission passage skilled and the custom.
出处
《按摩与康复医学》
2011年第3期110-111,共2页
Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词
肱骨干中下1/3骨折
手术入路
内固定
In the brachium backbone the next 1/3 bone fracture Ooerative approach In fixed