期刊文献+

Bones and Crohn’s:No benefit of adding sodium fluoride or ibandronate to calcium and vitamin D

Bones and Crohn's:No benefit of adding sodium fluoride or ibandronate to calcium and vitamin D
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To compare the effect of calcium and cholecalciferol alone and along with additional sodium fluoride or ibandronate on bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Patients (n =148) with reduced BMD (T-score < -1) were randomized to receive cholecalciferol (1000 IU) and calcium citrate (800 mg) daily alone(group A, n = 32) or along with additional sodium fluoride (25 mg bid) (group B, n = 62) or additional ibandronate (1 mg iv/3-monthly) (group C, n = 54). Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and proximal right femur and X-rays of the spine were performed at baseline and after 1.0, 2.25 and 3.5 years. Fracture-assessment included visual reading of X-rays and quantitative morphometry of vertebral bodies (T4-L4).RESULTS: One hundred and twenty three (83.1%) patients completed the first year for intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Ninety two (62.2%) patients completed the second year and 71 (47.8%) the third year available for per-protocol (PP) analysis. With a significant increase in T-score of the lumbar spine by +0.28 ± 0.35 [95% conf idence interval (CI): 0.162-0.460, P < 0.01], +0.33 ± 0.49 (95% CI: 0.109-0.558, P < 0.01), +0.43 ± 0.47 (95% CI: 0.147-0.708, P < 0.01) in group A, +0.22 ± 0.33 (95% CI: 0.125-0.321, P < 0.01); +0.47 ± 0.60 (95% CI: 0.262-0.676, P < 0.01), +0.51 ± 0.44 (95% CI: 0.338-0.682, P < 0.01) in group B and +0.22 ± 0.38 (95% CI: 0.111-0.329, P < 0.01), +0.36 ± 0.53 (95% CI: 0.147-0.578, P < 0.01), +0.41 ± 0.48 (95% CI: 0.238-0.576, P < 0.01) in group C, respectively, during the 1.0, 2.25 and 3.5 year periods (PP analysis), no treatment regimen was superior in any in- or between-group analyses. In the ITT analysis, similar results in all in- and between-group analyses with a significant in-group but non-significant between-group increase in T-score of the lumbar spine by 0.38 ± 0.46 (group A, P < 0.01), 0.37 ± 0.50 (group B, P < 0.01) and 0.35 ± 0.49 (group C, P < 0.01) was observed. Follow-up in ITT analysis was still 2.65 years. One vertebral fracture in the sodium fluoride group was detected. Study medication was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Additional sodium fluoride or ibandronate had no benefit over calcium and cholecalciferol alone in managing reduced BMD in CD. AIM: To compare the effect of calcium and cholecalciferol alone and along with additional sodium fluoride or ibandronate on bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). METHODS: Patients (n =148) with reduced BMD (T-score -1) were randomized to receive cholecalciferol (1000 IU) and calcium citrate (800 mg) daily alone(group A, n = 32) or along with additional sodium fluoride (25 mg bid) (group B, n = 62) or additional ibandronate (1 mg iv/3-monthly) (group C, n = 54). Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and proximal right femur and X-rays of the spine were performed at baseline and after 1.0, 2.25 and 3.5 years. Fracture-assessment included visual reading of X-rays and quantitative morphometry of vertebral bodies (T4-L4).RESULTS: One hundred and twenty three (83.1%) patients completed the first year for intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Ninety two (62.2%) patients completed the second year and 71 (47.8%) the third year available for per-protocol (PP) analysis. With a significant increase in T-score of the lumbar spine by +0.28 ± 0.35 [95% conf idence interval (CI): 0.162-0.460, P 0.01], +0.33 ± 0.49 (95% CI: 0.109-0.558, P 0.01), +0.43 ± 0.47 (95% CI: 0.147-0.708, P 0.01) in group A, +0.22 ± 0.33 (95% CI: 0.125-0.321, P 0.01); +0.47 ± 0.60 (95% CI: 0.262-0.676, P 0.01), +0.51 ± 0.44 (95% CI: 0.338-0.682, P 0.01) in group B and +0.22 ± 0.38 (95% CI: 0.111-0.329, P 0.01), +0.36 ± 0.53 (95% CI: 0.147-0.578, P 0.01), +0.41 ± 0.48 (95% CI: 0.238-0.576, P 0.01) in group C, respectively, during the 1.0, 2.25 and 3.5 year periods (PP analysis), no treatment regimen was superior in any in- or between-group analyses. In the ITT analysis, similar results in all in- and between-group analyses with a significant in-group but non-significant between-group increase in T-score of the lumbar spine by 0.38 ± 0.46 (group A, P 0.01), 0.37 ± 0.50 (group B, P 0.01) and 0.35 ± 0.49 (group C, P 0.01) was observed. Follow-up in ITT analysis was still 2.65 years. One vertebral fracture in the sodium fluoride group was detected. Study medication was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Additional sodium fluoride or ibandronate had no benefit over calcium and cholecalciferol alone in managing reduced BMD in CD.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第3期334-342,共9页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 柠檬酸钙 氟化钠 维生素D 双能X射线 骨骼 治疗方案 ITT Crohn’s disease Bone mineral density Vertebral fracture Cholecalciferol Calcium Ibandronate Sodium fluoride
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献37

  • 1[1]Kanis JA.Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis:synopsis of a WHO report.WHO Study Group.Osteoporos Int 1994; 4:368-381
  • 2[2]Bjarnason I,Macpherson A,Mackintosh C,Buxton-Thomas M,Forgacs I,Moniz C.Reduced bone density in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Gut 1997; 40:228-233
  • 3[3]Pollak RD,Karmeli F,Eliakim R,Ackerman Z,Tabb K,Rachmilewitz D.Femoral neck osteopenia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93:1483-1490
  • 4[4]Schulte C,Dignass AU,Mann K,Goebell H.Reduced bone mineral density and unbalanced bone metabolism in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Inflamm Bowel Dis 1998; 4:268-275
  • 5[5]Compston JE,Judd D,Crawley EO,Evans WD,Evans C,Church HA,Reid EM,Rhodes J.Osteoporosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Gut 1987; 28:410-415
  • 6[6]Pigot F,Roux C,Chaussade S,Hardelin D,Pelleter O,Du Puy Montbrun T,Listrat V,Dougados M,Couturier D,Amor B.Low bone mineral density in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Dig Dis Sci 1992; 37:1396-1403
  • 7[7]Abitbol V,Roux C,Chaussade S,Guillemant S,Kolta S,Dougados M,Couturier D,Amor B.Metabolic bone assessment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Gastroenterology 1995; 108:417-422
  • 8[30]Croucher PI,Vedi S,Motley RJ,Garrahan NJ,Stanton MR,Compston JE.Reduced bone formation in patients with osteoporosis associated with inflammatory bowel disease.Osteoporos Int 1993; 3:236-241
  • 9[31]Hansen MA,Overgaard K,Riis BJ,Christiansen C.Role of peak bone mass and bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis:12 year study.BMJ 1991; 303:961-964
  • 10[32]Uebelhart D,Schlemmer A,Johansen JS,Gineyts E,Christiansen C,Delmas PD.Effect of menopause and hormone replacement therapy on the urinary excretion of pyridinium cross-links.J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991;72:367-373

共引文献1

  • 1Arjuna Priyadarsin de Silva,Aranjan Lionel Karunanayake,Thalahitiya Gamaralalage Iruka Dissanayaka,Anuradha Supun Dassanayake,Hewa Kattadi Kankanamgae Tilak Duminda,Arunasalam Pathmeswaran,Ananda Rajitha Wickramasinghe,Hithanadura Janaka de Silva.Osteoporosis in adult Sri Lankan inflammatory bowel disease patients[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2009,15(28):3528-3531.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部