期刊文献+

马丁·怀特与国际关系理论三大思想传统——兼论对构建中国国际关系理论的启示 被引量:3

Martin Wight,the Three Traditions of International Theory and Its Implications for the Construction of Chinese IR Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 作者详细阐述了英国著名国际关系理论家马丁·怀特提出的国际关系理论三大思想传统的精神风貌、哲理内涵及其对构建中国国际关系理论的启示。怀特界定的思想传统本质上是一种"分析传统"而不是"历史传统",这不仅体现在怀特构建其三大传统的根本目的上,而且体现在怀特对"传统"本身的理解上。怀特用以划分其三大传统的首要标准是国际政治的"国内类比",而怀特构建的理想主义思想传统的主要特点就在于根本上否定了"国内类比"的适用性。怀特构建的三大传统不仅对国际关系思想史的研究具有重要价值,也集中体现了国际关系理论研究之经典方法的重要特征,这些特征对现代国际关系理论研究同样具有重要意义。怀特构建的三大传统的价值不仅在于为"英国学派"国际社会理论的发展奠定了基础,而且在于其理论及方法论取向对构建中国国际关系理论具有很大的启发性,而这点正是我们研究怀特思想的现实意义。 This article purports to analyze in detail the intellectual contents,philosophical connotations as well as theoretical implications of the three traditions of international theory constructed by Martin Wight.The author contends that,the tradition per se proposed by Wight is the analytical rather than the historical one,and this was demonstrated typically through Wight's declared aims for his construction as well as through his personal understanding of the essence of intellectual traditions.The author argues,the prior standard used implicitly by Wight to distinguish the three traditions is,as Hedley Bull once suggested,the domestic analogy of international politics,and the primary characteristic of the rationalist tradition proposed by Wight is to deny the applicability of this analogy which based on the Hobbesian doctrine of the state of nature.This article emphatically points out that,the three traditions of international theory constructed by Wight vividly embodied the most important characteristics of the classical approach in the study of international theory,and this approach has as yet enjoyed invaluable significance for the construction of modern international theory.In the final section,the author discusses specifically the theoretical implications of Wight's methodological approaches for the construction of contemporary Chinese international theory.
作者 吴征宇
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期4-17,共14页 World Economics and Politics
基金 中国人民大学985项目资金资助
关键词 马丁·怀特 国内类比 思想传统 经典方法 Martin Wight,the domestic analogy,intellectual traditions,classical approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献52

  • 1David Yost, "Political Philosophy and the Theory of IR," International Affairs, Vol. 70, No. 2, 1994, p. 277.
  • 2Hedley Bull, The Anar-chieal Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.
  • 3Ian Hall, The International Thought of Martin Wight, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
  • 4Hedley Bull,"Martin Wight and the Theory of IR," British Journal of International Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1976, pp. 101-116.
  • 5David Yost, "Political Philosophy and the Theory of IR," pp. 263-290.
  • 6Jens Bartelson, "Short Circuits: Society and Tradition in IR," Review of lnternational Studies, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1996, pp. 339-360.
  • 7时殷弘,叶凤丽.现实主义·理性主义·革命主义─—国际关系思想传统及其当代典型表现[J].欧洲研究,1995,16(3):4-16. 被引量:43
  • 8Edward H. Carr, The Twenty Years' Crisis 1919-1939, New York: Palgrave, 2001.
  • 9Hans J. Morgenthau, Scientific Man vs. Power Politics, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1962.
  • 10John Herz, Political Realism and Political l- dealism, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1986.

共引文献42

同被引文献71

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部