摘要
近年来有一种观点提出,毛泽东在遵义会议上没有担任负总责这个职务,因而否认遵义会议确立了毛泽东在党中央的领导地位。这种观点并不符合历史事实。分析这个历史问题的关键在于看问题的角度和方法,究竟是从形式上看问题,还是从实质上看问题。据目前披露的大量史料,在当时党内高层是有不少领导同志推荐和拥护毛泽东来接替博古担任最高领导职务的,但毛泽东从维护党的团结这个大局出发,主张由张闻天先干一个时期比较合适。毛泽东虽然不是名义上的党和红军的最高领导人,但他实际上在遵义会议后形成的中央领导集体中起到了领导核心的作用。
There’s one view put forward in recent years that Zunyi Meeting hadn’t established Mao Zedong’s leadership in the CPC Central Committee since Mao Zedong didn’t assume overall responsibility position in Zunyi Meeting.This view is not consistent with historical fact.The key of analyzing this historical issue lies in the approach to it,i.e.,whether it is viewed from forms or from substance.According to the historical material disclosed till the present,there were many senior party leaders at the time recommended Mao Zedong to replace Gu Bo to take the highest leadership position.However,considering the maintenance of unity of the party,Mao Zedong advocated Zhang Wentian to take the position first for a period of time.Therefore,although Mao Zedong was not the nominal top leader of the party and of the Red Army,it is during Zunyi Meeting that his leading role in the central collective leadership was established.
出处
《马克思主义研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第4期19-27,159,共9页
Studies on Marxism
基金
2010年度国家社科基金项目"近年来党史研究中的历史虚无主义思潮评析"(10BDJ010)的阶段性成果