非相关文献知识发现有效性评价的研究现状及评述

对国内外非相关文献知识发现的有效性评价研究现状进行扫描，根据有效性评价的方式和标准的不同，将非相关文献知识发现的有效性评价研究分为五大类，包括：临床验证、以Swanson研究为标准、统计评估、专家评估、重复前人实验等，进而通过对各有效性评价研究的实施过程分析，评述各评价方法的优势和劣势。

The article makes a survey of the research status of validity evaluation of disjoint literature-based knowledge discovery at home and abroad. According to the differences among the manners and standards of validity evaluation, the researches on validity evaluation of disjoint literature-based knowledge discovery are divided into 5 major types, that is, clinical verification, taking Swanson research as the standard, statistical evaluation, expert e- valuation, and repeating the predecessors＇ experiment. The article further comments on the advantages and disadvantages of various evaluation methods by analyzing the implementation process of all researches on validity evaluation.