期刊文献+

肾移植患者应用微乳化环孢素后监测血药谷浓度、峰浓度的临床价值比较 被引量:4

Comparison of clinical value in monitoring blood concentration trough level and peak level of micro emulsion ciclosporin for renal transplant recipients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对应用微乳化环孢素(又称新山地明,sandimmun neoral)的肾移植患者进行血药浓度监测,比较监测血药谷浓度(C0)和峰浓度(C2)的临床价值。方法对122例接受同种尸体肾移植的患者术后随机分为Ⅰ组(62例)和Ⅱ组(60例),两组均采用微乳化环孢素+麦考酚吗乙酯(MMF)+肾上腺皮质激素三联免疫抑制剂方案。两组分别以C2、C0作为微乳化环孢素血药浓度监测及调整剂量的指标。Ⅰ组微乳化环孢素的C2目标浓度:3个月内为1200~1400ng/ml,3~6个月为900~1200ng/ml。Ⅱ组微乳化环孢素的C0目标浓度:3个月内为250~350ng/ml,3~6个月为200~250ng/ml。比较两组移植术后3个月内(术后1周、2周、4周、12周4个时点)微乳化环孢素C0、C2值,并与血药浓度-时间曲线下面积(area under the plasma concentration-time curve,AUC)0~12进行直线相关分析。比较急性排斥反应(AR)与非AR患者的C0、C2值及AUC0~12。记录微乳化环孢素相关肝、肾毒性反应时血药C0、C2值,并与AUC0~12进行直线相关分析。结果所有患者均得到随访,平均随访时间12.7个月。肾移植术后3个月内微乳化环孢素C0值与AUC0~12无相关(r=0.41,P〉0.05),C2值与AUC0~12呈正相关(r=0.87,P〈0.05)。Ⅱ组AR发生率明显高于Ⅰ组(28%比7%,P〈0.05)。AR患者的微乳化环孢素C0平均值在目标浓度范围内,但C2值明显低于非AR患者,且AR患者的AUC0~12明显低于非AR患者(P〈0.05~P〈0.01)。微乳化环孢素的C0、C2值和AUC0~12与该药相关的肝、肾毒性反应无关。结论对于肾移植术后早期微乳化环孢素的血药浓度监测,C0值并不能精确地反映该药的血药浓度;C2值与AUC0~12具有较好的相关性,C2值对预测排斥反应及肾移植患者的免疫抑制是否足够更为敏感。 Objective To monitor the blood concentration of micro emulsion ciclosporin(sandimmun neoral)in renal transplant recipients and compare the clinical value between blood concentration trough level(C0)and peak level(C2).Methods One hundred and twenty-two cadaveric renal transplant recipients were randomly divided into group Ⅰ(n=62)and group Ⅱ(n=60).All patients were treated with micro emulsion ciclosporin,mycophenolate mofetil(MMF)and adrenal cortex hormone.C0 and C2 in two groups were chosen as indices to monitor the blood concentration and adjust dosage.The target levels C2 of Sandimmun neoral in groupⅠ were 1 200-1 400 ng/ml during the first 3 months after transplantation and 900-1 200 ng/ml from 3 to 6 months after transplantation.The target levels C0 of Sandimmun neoral in groupⅡ were 250-350 ng/ml in the first 3 months after transplantation and 200-250 ng/ml from 3 to 6 months after transplantation.The C0 and C2 values of two groups were compared in 3 months after transplantation(4 different time points of week 1,week 2,week 4,week 12 after transplantation).The linear correlation analysis was taken in C0,C2 values and area under the plasma concentration-time curve(AUC)0-12.The C0,C2 values and AUC0-12 were compared in acute rejection(AR)cases and no AR cases.The C0,C2 values of micro emulsion ciclosporin were recorded when the drug's related hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity occurred.And the linear correlation analysis was taken in C0,C2 values and AUC0-12.Results All patients were followed up(mean 12.7 months).There was no significant correlation between C0 values and AUC0-12 in 3 months after renal transplantation(r=0.41,P0.05).And there was significantly positive correlation between C2 values and AUC0-12(r=0.87,P0.05).The incidence of AR in groupⅡ was higher than that in groupⅠ(28 % vs.7 %,P0.05).The average values of micro emulsion ciclosporin C0 in AR patients were within the target range.But C2 values and AUC0-12 of AR patients were significantly lower than that of patients without AR(P0.05-P0.01).The C0,C2 values and AUC0-12 had no correlation with micro emulsion ciclosporin related hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity.Conclusions C0 value is not a good parameter for monitoring the blood concentration of micro emulsion ciclosporin after renal transplantation.There is significant positive correlation between C2 value and AUC0-12.C2 value is more sensitive to predict rejection and immunosuppression after renal transplantation.
出处 《器官移植》 CAS 2011年第3期157-161,共5页 Organ Transplantation
基金 卫生部国际交流与合作课题(IHECC07-001)
关键词 微乳化环孢素 微乳化制剂 新山地明 血药浓度 肾移植 药物监测 Micro emulsion ciclosporin Micro emulsion preparation Sandimmun neoral Blood concentration Renal transplantation Drug monitor
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Hesselink DA,van Dam T,Metselaar HJ,et al.The relative importance of cyclosporine exposure in heart,kidney or liver transplant recipients on maintenance therapy[J].Transpl Int,2004,17(9):495-504.
  • 2International Neoral Renal Transplantation Study Group.Cyclosporine microemulsion(neoral)absorption profiling and sparse-sample predictors during the first 3 months after renal transplantation[J].Am J Transplant,2002,2(2):148-156.
  • 3Stoves J,Baker R,Newstead CG.Measurement of cyclosporin exposure in renal transplant recipients during the early post-operative period:is C2 alone sufficient?[J] Nephrol Dial Transplant,2005,20(4):854-855.
  • 4Karamperis N,Koefoed-Nielsen P,Bagger Srensen A,et al.Role of metabolites and calcineurin inhibition on C2 monitoring in renal transplant patients[J].Nephrol Dial Transplant,2005,20(3):618-621.
  • 5Arwa YA,Noorizan AA,Yahaya H,et al.Therapeutic monitoring of cyclosporine in renal transplant patients[J].Int J Pharmacy Pharm Sci,2010,2(Suppl 4):224-226.
  • 6Keown P,Kahan BD,Johnston A,et al.Optimization of cyclosporine therapy with new therapeutic drug monitoring strategies:report from the International Neoral TDM Advisory Consensus Meeting(Vancouver,November 1997)[J].Transplant Proc,1998,30(5):1645-1649.
  • 7Mahalati K,Belitsky P,West K,et al.Approaching the therapeutic window for cyclosporine in kidney transplantation:a prospective study[J].J Am Soc Nephrol,2001,12(4):828-833.
  • 8Cantarovich M,Ross H,Arizón JM,et al.Benefit of Neoral C2 monitoring in de novo cardiac transplant recipients receiving basiliximab induction[J].Transplantation,2008,85(7):992-999.
  • 9Carstens J.Three-years experience with Neoral C2 monitoring adjusted to a target range of 500-600 ng/ml in long-term renal transplant recipients receiving dual immunosuppressive therapy[J].Scand J Urol Nephrol,2008,42(3):286-292.
  • 10Halloran P.Calcineurin inhibition-relationship to cyclosporin blood concentration[M] // Halloran P,Johnston A,Kahan BD,et al.Focus on Medicine.13rd ed.Oxford:Blackwell Science,1998:15-18.

同被引文献21

  • 1陈鹭颖,史道华,曾昭全,吴锐枫,刘锡钧.2小时环孢素A血药浓度是预测移植肾排异反应的敏感指标[J].中国药学杂志,2004,39(9):707-708. 被引量:9
  • 2汪作良,袁弘,章槿.环孢素A固体脂质纳米粒的制备与理化性质考察[J].中国药学杂志,2005,40(6):444-447. 被引量:5
  • 3郑师明,司徒冰,谭湘萍,卢敏妍.肾移植患者环孢素A血药浓度监测指标峰浓度C_2与谷浓度C_0的比较[J].现代食品与药品杂志,2006,16(5):14-17. 被引量:2
  • 4Sagar R.Mudshinge,Amol B.Deore,Sachin Patil,et al.Nanoparticles:Emerging carriers for drug delivery[J].SaudiPharmaceutical Journal,2011,19(3):129-141.
  • 5Li Shaoyong,Zhao Baokai,Wang Fenghua,et al.Yakinterferon-alpha loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for controlledrelease[J].Research in Veterinary Science,2010,88(1):148-153.
  • 6González-Mira,M L García.Preparation characterization andbiocompatibility studies on risperidone-loaded solid lipidnanoparticles:High pressure homogenization versus ultrasound[J].Colloids and Surfaces B:Biointerfaces,2011,86(1):158-165.
  • 7Cui Jiewei,Yang Jing,Cao Weike,et al.Differential diagnosis ofacute rejection and chronic cyclosporine nephropathy after rat renaltransplantation by detection of endothelial microparticles(EMP)[J].Medical Hypotheses,2010,75(6):666-668.
  • 8Xiao Zheng,Shan Juan,Li Chengwen,et al.CrmA gene transferrescued CsA-induced renal cell apoptosis in graft kidney[J].CellularImmunology,2010,265(1):6-8.
  • 9Gombotz W R,Wee S F.Protein release from alginate matrices[J].Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews,1998,31:267-285.
  • 10Zhao W, Fakhoury M, Jacqz-Aigrain E,et al. Developmental phar- macogenetics of immunosuppressants in pediatric organ transplanta- tion [J]. Ther Drug Monit,2010,32(6) :688 -699.

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部