期刊文献+

美国全民科技专案之小学科技素养指标现况——以布鲁姆教育目标分类系统(修订版)知识向度分析 被引量:3

Standards for technological literacy of elementary schools completed by technology for all Americans project——Analyzing of knowledge dimension from Bloom's classification system of educational objectives(Revised Edition)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以布鲁姆(Bloom)教育目标分类系统(修订版)知识向度为分析主轴,兼采描述性统计探讨"美国全民科技专案"(TFAAP)——科技素养指标:学习科技的内容,在知识向度四主要类型和十一次要类型上整体评估与分析。研究发现:美国小学科技素养指针内涵在知识内容范畴中,四主要类型以"概念知识"所占比例最多(36.6%);其次依序为"后设认知知识"(30.7%)、"程序知识"(24.8%)、"事实知识"(7.9%);五大学习领域又以"设计的世界"层面对知识向度呈现最多之比例占(36.6%),其次依序为"科技的本质"(19.8%)、"科技世界所需的能力"(18.8%)、"设计"(13.9%)、"科技和社会"(10.9%);另外十一个知识向度次要类型在"设计的世界"层面涵盖也相当完整,最后,汇整其研究发现并提出结论,期能供教育工作者以及后续分析之参考。 Taking the knowledge dimension of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives(Revised Version) as the mainstream of analysis,and adopting descriptive statistics,the paper reviews the document of 'Standards for Technological Literacy(STL):Content for the Study of Technology' completed by Technology for All Americans Project(TfAAP) in 2000,and then makes an overall evaluation and analysis of the four major types and eleven subtypes in knowledge dimension.As found in the research results,among the four major types are the most with proportion of 'concept knowledge'(36.6%),Secondly in order 'meta cognitive knowledge'(30.7%),'procedural knowledge'(24.8%),'fact knowledge'(7.9%),in the five main learning areas,the aspect of 'The designed world' shows the most proportion(36.6%) to knowledge dimension,in order 'the nature of technology'(19.8%),'abilities for a technological world'(18.8%),'design'(13.9%),'technology and society'(10.9%);It is quite intact that other eleven subtypes of knowledge dimension contain on the aspect of 'The designed world'.Finally,the study rearranges the research findings and gives conclusions,which are expected to serve as a basis for the related technology teachers in setting up their instructional goals,devising instructional activities and designing evaluation of their students,and are hoped to be referential for analysis in the later days.
出处 《教学研究》 2011年第2期79-83,92,共5页 Research in Teaching
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Kendall J S,Marzano R J.Content knowledge:A compendium of standards and benchmarks for k-12 education[M].Alexandria,VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development(ASCD),2000.
  • 2Dugger W E Jr.Twenty years of education standards for technology education in the united states.M.J.de Vries,I.Mottier(eds.)[C].Intc-cnational Handbook of Technology Education,2006:65-81.
  • 3Anderson L W,Krathwohl D R,Airasian P W,et al.A taxonomy for learning,teaching,and assessing:a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives[M].New York:Longman,2001:41-46.
  • 4International Technology Education Association (ITEA).(2000).Standards for technological literacy:Content for the study of technology[EB/OL].(2006-12-25)[2009-11-25].http://www.iteaconnect.org/TAA/PDFs/xstnd.pdf.
  • 5卢雪梅.从技术面谈九年一贯课程能力指标建构-美国学习标准建构的启示.教育研究信息,2004,12(2):3-34.
  • 6徐启源.中英美澳四国小学科技教育课程之比较研究[D].台湾:台中师范学院国民教育研究所,2002:104.
  • 7Wheeler P,Haertal G D.Resource Handbook on Performance Assessment and Measurement:A Tool for Smdent,Practitioners,and Policymakers[M].EREAPA Associates,1993:40-43.
  • 8杨振升 洪淑萍.基本能力指标与转化-以语文学习领域为例.教育研究月刊,2002,(96):23-33.
  • 9郑蒽如 林世华.布鲁姆认知领域教育目标分类修订版理论与实务之探讨一以九年一贯数学领域分段能力指标为例.台东大学教育学报,2004,15(2):247-274.
  • 10欧用生.两性平等的道德课程设计[C]//两性教育及教科书研讨会论文集.台湾:国立中正大学成人教育中心,1994.

同被引文献16

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部