期刊文献+

微创经皮椎体成形术在控制脊柱转移性肿瘤围术期感染中的效果观察 被引量:6

Effect of minimally invasive percutaneous vertebroplasty on infection control of spinal metastatic tumors during perioperative period
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨微创经皮椎体成形术在控制脊柱转移性肿瘤围术期感染中的效果。方法选取2008年2月-2010年10月进行治疗的26例脊柱转移性肿瘤患者为研究对象,将其根据手术方式分为A组:开放式椎体后凸成形术组,B组:微创经皮椎体成形术组,每组各13例;将两组患者的感染发生率及手术前后的血清CRP、IL-6、IL-8及TNF-α水平进行统计及比较。结果感染发生率A组为23.1%、B组为0;B组术后1、3 d血清CRP为(27.86±6.34、13.24±4.68)mg/L,IL-6为(176.50±13.05、98.77±9.86)ng/L,IL-8为(298.64±23.56、156.41±25.60)ng/L,TNF-α为(23.24±4.01、15.09±3.50)ng/L;A组CRP(18.12±5.06、8.76±2.15)mg/L,IL-6为(113.02±12.45、72.37±10.87)ng/L,IL-8为(245.96±22.38、102.34±23.14)ng/L,TNF-α为(16.20±2.78、9.46±2.96)ng/L;B组水平均低于A组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论微创经皮椎体成形术,在控制脊柱转移性肿瘤围术期感染中的效果较好,优势明显。 OBJECTIVE To study the effect of minimally invasive percutaneous vertebroplasty in infection control of spinal metastatic tumors during perioperative priod.METHODS A total of 26 patients with spinal metastatic tumors from Feb 2008 to Oct 2010 were selected as research object,and they were divided into group A(open percutaneous kyphoplasty group)13 cases and group B(minimally invasive percutaneous vertebroplasty group)13 cases,then the infection rate and serum CRP,IL-6,IL-8,TNF-α before and after the surgery were analyzed and compared.RESULTS The infection rate of group B(23.1%)was lower than that of group A(0),serum CRP(27.86±6.34,13.24±4.68)mg/L,IL-6(176.50±13.05,98.77±9.86)ng/L,IL-8(298.64±23.56,156.41±25.60)ng/L,TNF-α(23.24±4.01,15.09±3.50)ng/L of group B after surgery at first and third day were all lower than those of group A with CRP(18.12±5.06,8.76±2.15)mg/L,IL-6(113.02±12.45,72.37±10.87)ng/L,IL-8(245.96±22.38,102.34±23.14)ng/L,TNF-α(16.20±2.78,9.46±2.96)ng/L,the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05).CONCLUSION The effect of minimally invasive percutaneous vertebroplasty in infection control of spinal metastatic tumors perioperative is better,and the advantage is obvious.
作者 刘佐庆
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期1764-1765,共2页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词 微创经皮椎体成形术 脊柱转移性肿瘤 围术期 感染 效果 Minimally invasive percutaneous vertebroplasty Spinal metastatic tumors Perioperative period Infection Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1姜华昌.经皮穿刺椎体成形术治疗脊椎转移瘤[J].中国现代医生,2010,48(5):153-154. 被引量:4
  • 2Fizazi K, Carducci M, Smith M, et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, doubleblind study[J]. Lancet,2011,377(9768) :813--822.
  • 3李高文,刘素云,李毅刚,罗飞燕,陈志仁,徐晓南.脊椎转移瘤经皮椎体成形术与放射治疗对比观察[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2009,6(1):76-78. 被引量:7
  • 4Taleb FS, Guha A, Arnold PM, et al. Surgical management of cervical spine manifestations of neurofibromatosis Type 1 : long-term clinical and radiological follow-up in 22 cases[J]. J Neurosurg Spine,2011,4(3) :356-366.

二级参考文献12

共引文献9

同被引文献40

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部