期刊文献+

自制皮肤科治疗车及换药容器的临床效果观察 被引量:2

Clinical observations on effects of self-made therapy cart and dressing jar in dermatology department
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨自制皮肤科治疗车及换药容器的临床效果。方法分别同时随机采集自制治疗车使用的14组换药容器(试验组)与传统治疗车使用的14组换药弯盘(对照组),于每天14∶00、17∶00进行连续14 d采样,做细菌培养,比较两种菌落数差异。结果 14∶00试验组与对照组菌落数分别为(14.843±9.300)、(23.807±11.425)CFU/100 cm2,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),17∶00试验组与对照组菌落数分别为(46.550±26.656)(、83.700±31.998)CFU/100 cm2,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);试验组敷药医院感染率为0,而对照组为1.43%。结论自制皮肤科治疗车及换药容器敷药效果优于传统治疗车及换药盘。 OBJECTIVE To explore the clinical efficiency of the self-made therapy cart of the dermatology department and changing dressing jar.METHODS A total of 14 groups of dressing jars in the experimental self-made therapy carts were simultaneously selected randomly in correspondence to the other 14 groups of dressing plates of the traditional therapy cart,to continuously sample 14d 14∶00-17∶00 each day for germiculture and,then the differences of the amount of the colony were compared.RESULTS According to the contrast between the two groups,the amount of the colony were(14.843±9.300),(23.807±11.425) CFU/100cm2 at 2 p.m.(P〈0.05)and the number turned to(46.550±26.656),(83.700±31.998)CFU/100cm2 at 5 p.m.(P〈0.01).The infection rate of the dressing of the experimental group was 0,while it was 1.43% in control group.CONCLUSION The clinical efficacy of the self-made therapy cart of the dermatology department and changing dressing jar is better than the dressing plates and the traditional therapy cart.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期1822-1823,共2页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词 自制 治疗车 换药容器 Self-made Therapy cart Dressing jar
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献12

共引文献49

同被引文献18

  • 1葛志红,董宇,侯学智,庞爱莲.密闭式输液治疗车的改制与应用[J].护理学杂志,2007,22(12):53-53. 被引量:5
  • 2Isaacs AN, Doolin M, Morse C, et al. Medication utilization evaluation of dabigatran and rivaroxaban within a large, multi-center health system[J]. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2016,73(5 Suppl 1) :$35-$41.
  • 3Sharpe E,Pettit J,Ellsbury DL. A national survey of neona- tal peripherally inserted central catheter(PICC)practices[J]. Adv Neonatal Care, 2013,13 ( 1 ) : 55-74.
  • 4Sarzynski E, Hashmi H, Subramanian J,et al. Opportuni- ties to improve clinical summaries for patients at hospital discharge[J]. BMJ Qual Saf,2016,5(6) : 15-19.
  • 5Pan SD,Zhu LL,Chen M,et al. Weight-based dosing in medication use :What should we know?[J]. Patient Prefer Adherence, 2016, 12(10) : 549-560.
  • 6Credland N. How to perform a tracheostomy dressing and inner cannula change[J]. Nurs Stand, 2016,30 (30) : 34- 36.
  • 7Souliotis K, Kalemikerakis I, Saridi M,et al. A cost and clinical effectiveness analysis among moist wound heal- ing dressings versus traditional methods in home care patients with pressure ulcers[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2016,24(3) : 596-601.
  • 8王艳,杨晓海,李钢,刘丽.安尔碘用于黏膜部位手术切口消毒的临床效果观察[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2010,20(8):1113-1114. 被引量:7
  • 9刘晨冰,刘伟.门诊外科换药疗效探析[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2011,13(6):209-210. 被引量:3
  • 10李小红.护理用具与护理管理的发展现状及矛盾分析[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2011,18(3):171-173. 被引量:3

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部