期刊文献+

说不出名字的歧视——论性倾向歧视和性别歧视的关系 被引量:3

Discrimination Unproven: The Relationship between Sex Orientation Discrimination and Sex Discrimination
原文传递
导出
摘要 任何基于性倾向歧视的法律都构成性别歧视,这是一种保护同性恋平等权利的性别歧视进路。这种进路的表面语义分析认为,几乎所有的性倾向歧视的法律都要使用性别分类。因为性倾向的判断基础就是一个人的性别以及他(或者她)情欲伙伴的性别。性别歧视进路的文化分析是,性别歧视主义和异性恋霸权互相支撑。如果接受了这样的进路,法院将会改变违宪审查的基准来保护同性恋权利,从性倾向的合理审查到性别的中等程度审查。法院出于审慎的原则可能不会接受。更重要的是,用性别歧视进路来保护同性恋权利把性倾向歧视封闭在了柜子里,向社会传达的信息是,在公共论坛上谈论性倾向歧视是不合适的。法院也没有机会处理这一核心道德议题。 To recognize any law discriminates based on sex orientation as sex discrimination is an approach to protect the equal rights of homosexuals by sex discrimination.Semantic analysis for this is that all laws discriminate based on sex orientation categorize by gender.Cultural analysis for this is that sex discrimination is co-supported with heterosexuals.If such approaches are accepted,courts will change the criteria of judicial review to protect the rights of homosexuals from reasonable review of sex orientation to middle-tie review of gender,which could be denied by courts due to judicial prudence.Moreover,such approach make the image that it is not proper to talk about sex orientation in public,and the court would not have the opportunity to deal with this core moral issue.
作者 郭晓飞
出处 《法制与社会发展》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期105-117,共13页 Law and Social Development
关键词 性倾向歧视 性别歧视 中等程度审查 司法审慎 sex orientation discrimination sex discrimination middle-tie review judicial prudence
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Robert Wintemute. Sexual Orientation and Human Rights: The United States Constitution, the 'European Convention and the Canadian Charter [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
  • 2Reedy. Reed [Z]. 404U. S. 71 (1971).
  • 3Frontiero v. Richardson [Z]. 411 U. S. 677 (1973).
  • 4Serena Mayeri. A Common Fate of Discrimination: Race - Gender Analogies in Legal and Historical Perspective [ J ]. The Yale Law Journal, 2001, (110).
  • 5Andrew Koppelman. Three Arguments for Gay Rights [J]. Mich. Law. Review, 1997, (95).
  • 6Cass R. Sunstein. Homosexuality and the Constitution [ J]. Indiana Law Journal, 1994, (70).
  • 7Lovingv. Virginia [Z]. 388 U. S. 1 (1967).
  • 8Andrew Koppelman. why discrimination against lesbians and gay men is sex discrimination [J] New York University Law Review 1994, (69).
  • 9Edward Stein. Law, sexual orientation and gender [ A ]. Jules coleman, scott Shapiro. The oxford handbook of jurisprudence of law [ C ]. New York : Oxford University Press, 2002.
  • 10Clebume v. Cleburne Living Ctr [Z]. 473 U. S. 432,453 (1985) (Stevens, J. , concurring).

二级参考文献17

  • 1C·弗鲁埃尔-洛班,李有义.对母权制理论的马克思主义的重新评价[J].世界民族,1980(4):22-31. 被引量:4
  • 2周安平.婚姻家庭与人口生育立法分离之探讨[J].华东政法大学学报,1999,7(5):31-34. 被引量:5
  • 3周安平.对我国婚姻法原则的法理学思考[J].中国法学,2001(6):167-172. 被引量:19
  • 4(法)西蒙娜·德·波伏娃(SimonedeBeauvoir)著,陶铁柱.第二性[M]中国书籍出版社,1998.
  • 5(美)凯特·米利特(KateMillett)著,钟良明.性的政治[M]社会科学文献出版社,1999.
  • 6[英]梅因,H·S 著,沈景一.古代法[M]商务印书馆,1959.
  • 7[英]边沁(Jeremy Bentham) 著,时殷弘.道德与立法原理导论[M]商务印书馆,2000.
  • 8(美)理查德·A.波斯纳(RichardA.Posner)著,苏力.性与理性[M]中国政法大学出版社,2002.
  • 9(芬兰)E.A.韦斯特马克(EdwardA.Westermarck)著,李彬等.人类婚姻史[M]商务印书馆,2002.
  • 10(日)桥爪大三郎著,马黎明.性爱论[M]百花文艺出版社,2000.

共引文献7

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部