中文版儿童期虐待问卷信度及效度评价

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CTQ-SF

目的评价中文版儿童期虐待问卷（CTQ-SF）的信度和效度,为该量表在中国的推广使用提供科学依据。方法采用整群随机抽样方法抽取湖北省鄂州市4所中学的初一至高二年级共1 892名在校学生进行中文版CTQ-SF团体测试,检验其信度和效度。结果中文版CTQ-SF的总Cronbach’sα系数为0.73,情感虐待、躯体虐待、性虐待、情感忽视、躯体忽视5个分量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.23~0.74;条目间平均相关系数为0.20,各分量表平均相关系数为0.11~0.37;总分半信度系数为0.71,各分量表分半信度系数为0.31~0.71;各分量表与总量表的相关系数为0.54~0.80,差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.01）;各分量表与总量表的相关系数均超过各分量表间的相关系数为0.18~0.50,差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.01）;对量表进行探索性因子分析,经Sreen-test检验抽取的4个因子分别代表情感忽视因子、躯体和情感虐待因子、性虐待因子和躯体忽视因子,累计方差贡献率为66.12%,4个因子的共性方差均〉0.4,涵盖全部25个条目。结论中文版CTQ-SF是一种较好的儿童期虐待测评工具,但躯体忽视分量表需进一步修订。

Objective To explore the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Child Trauma Questionnarire-Short Form（CTQ-SF）,and to provide a theoretical foundation for its application.Methods A survey was conducted among 1892 teenagers with the Chinese version of CTQ-SF and the reliability and validity of the CTQ-SF were analyzed.Results The total Cronbach＇s alpha coefficient and split-half reliability of the CTQ-SF were higher than 0.70.The Cronbach＇s alpha coefficient and split-half reliability of each subscale were higher than 0.60 except physical neglect.The average correlation coefficient was 0.20 and the average correlation coefficient of each subscale ranged from 0.11 to 0.37.The correlation between general scale and subscales ranged from 0.54 to 0.80 with a significant correlation（P0.01）.The correlation coefficients between general scale and subscales were more than the correlation coefficients between the subscales.The correlation coefficients between the subscales ranged from 0.18 to 0.50（P0.01 for all）.Exploratory factor analyses selected a four-factor solution,accounting for 66.12% of the variance.Factor communalities were higher than 0.40.The four-factors represented all of the items.Conclusion The Chinese version of CTQ-SF is a good psychometric instrument for the evaluation of Chinese childhood abuse.But the physical neglect requires further improvement.