期刊文献+

城乡基本公共服务均等化标准的选择问题研究——基于政策敏感度和福利效果的比较分析 被引量:15

A Study on the Criterion Selection of Basic Public Service Equalization between Rural and Urban Areas——Comparative Analysis Based on Sensitivity and Welfare Effects of the Public Policy
原文传递
导出
摘要 关于基本公共服务要在城乡间实现怎样的均等这一问题,学术界提出了诸多不同的标准,本文针对其中最为常见和重要的三种——结果均等、福利均等和功利主义均等,进行了基于政策敏感度和福利效果的比较分析。通过构建考虑工业反哺农业、政府政策与居民行为之间存在互动关联的动态一般均衡模型和基于该模型的数值模拟,本文发现:城市化和工业反哺农业是工农业人均产出实现均衡的必要条件,但为保障国民经济的持续发展,工业对农业的反哺应有一定的限度;如果不考虑政策的制定和实施成本,则功利主义均等所对应的政策安排,无论是在政策敏感度还是在对城乡居民福利效果的比较分析中,均处于最优的位置。 On what kind of equality should be chosen by the Chinese government which wants to realize equalization of basic public service between rural and urban areas, the academe gives several kinds of equality as the criterion. In this paper, we use the way of numerical simulation based on a dynamic general equilibrium model which thinks of the mechanism of industry feeding agriculture in return and the interaction between public policy and the behavior of people, to compare three kinds of equality which are respectively based on the equality of resource, the equality of welfare and the utilitarian equality. The result is, industry feeding agriculture in return and urbanization is the essential condition of the equalization between agricultural and industrial output per capita, and the government should balance the scale of the industry feeding agriculture in return in order to ensure the persistent growth of national economy. Without regard to the cost of making and performing the policy, the utilitarian equality will be the best one based on the sensitivity and welfare effects analysis.
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期16-26,共11页 China Industrial Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"基本公共服务均等化的福利效果研究"(批准号10YJC790186) 安徽省教育厅人文社会科学研究重点项目"安徽省农村基础设施建设现状及农民满意度研究"(批准号2010sk164zd)
关键词 城乡 基本公共服务 均等 rural and urban areas basic public service equality
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Glass, A. Government Expenditure on Public Order and Safety, Economic Growth and Private Investment: Empirical Evidence from the United States[J]. International Review of Law and Economics, 2009, 29(1).
  • 2Gong, L., and Zou, H. Fiscal Federalism, Public Capital Formation, and Endogenous Growth [J]. Annals of Economics and Finance, 2002, (4).
  • 3Gurluk, S. Economic Growth, Industrial Pollution and Human Development in the Mediterranean Region [J]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68(8-9).
  • 4Kapteyn, A., Alessie, R., and Lusardi, A. Explaining the Wealth Holdings of Different Cohorts: Productivity Growth and Social Security[J]. European Economic Review, 2005, 49(5).
  • 5Kitaura, K. Child Labor, Education Aid, and Economic Growth[J]. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2009, 31(4).
  • 6Narayan, S., Narayan, P. K., and Mishra, S. Investigating the Relationship Between Health and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from a Panel of 5 Asian Countries[J]. Journal of Asian Economics, 2010, 21(4).
  • 7Sen, A. Inequality Reexamined [M]. New York: Harvard University Press, 1992.
  • 8安同良,卞加振,陆国庆.中国工业反哺农业的机制与模式:微观行为主体的视角[J].经济研究,2007,42(7):23-35. 被引量:44
  • 9傅道忠.实现基本公共服务均等化的财政思考[J].现代经济探讨,2007(5):12-14. 被引量:18
  • 10洪银兴.工业和城市反哺农业、农村的路径研究——长三角地区实践的理论思考[J].经济研究,2007,42(8):13-20. 被引量:133

二级参考文献196

共引文献1961

同被引文献223

引证文献15

二级引证文献109

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部